Search for: "Whitney v. California" Results 81 - 100 of 118
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Mar 2010, 3:52 am
Fung (IPblog)   US Copyright – Decisions Court of Appeal for the 5th Circuit: You can't claim ‘innocence’ of musical copyrights: Maverick Recording Company v Whitney Harper (Ars Technica) District Court Massachusetts: Tenenbaum and Nesson ordered to pay labels’ fees over discovery dispute; court finds ‘no extenuating circumstances’: Sony BMG v Tenenbaum (Copyright & Campaigns) (Ars Technics) District Court N D… [read post]
6 Mar 2010, 3:52 am
Fung (IPblog)   US Copyright – Decisions Court of Appeal for the 5th Circuit: You can't claim ‘innocence’ of musical copyrights: Maverick Recording Company v Whitney Harper (Ars Technica) District Court Massachusetts: Tenenbaum and Nesson ordered to pay labels’ fees over discovery dispute; court finds ‘no extenuating circumstances’: Sony BMG v Tenenbaum (Copyright & Campaigns) (Ars Technics) District Court N D… [read post]
27 Jun 2008, 3:00 pm
At page 51, Justice Scalia, writing for the court, cited a law review article entitled, “The Peculiar Story of United States v. [read post]
17 Dec 2008, 1:04 am
Dissemination of positive information about good judges would make it harder for legislators to fail to keep them.Jefferson might have agreed that what Justice Brandeis wrote in Whitney v. [read post]
7 Sep 2010, 4:02 am
§ 1679, et seq., prohibits provisions that purport to waive a consumer's right to sue in court for CROA violations.Pregnant welder sues employer for discriminationRoetzel & AndressOn August 10, 2010, the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals issued its decision in Spees v. [read post]
29 Nov 2010, 7:07 am by Lyle Denniston
  The new case involves a San Antonio young woman, Whitney Harper, who at age 16 had downloaded from the Internet a sizeable list of copyrighted music. [read post]
23 Feb 2016, 4:31 pm by Kevin LaCroix
” To cite just one example detailed Urofsky’s book, Justice Louis Brandeis’s separate opinion in Whitney v. [read post]
11 May 2010, 8:51 am by Matt Bartus
UPS (California 2009). $12.8 million settlement for misclassification of delivery drivers Gardner v. [read post]
27 Oct 2010, 11:50 am by Adrian Lurssen
"- From the archive: Comparison of Facebook Privacy Policy versions - April 2010 v Nov 2009 (by William Carleton):"Redline comparison to show differences between Facebook's posted privacy policy, dated April 22, 2010, as against a prior version dated November 19, 2009... [read post]
20 Jul 2022, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
While our cases prohibiting viewpoint discrimination would fetter the state's power to some degree, see R.A.V. v. [read post]