Search for: "Whittaker v. State" Results 1 - 20 of 75
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Nov 2021, 2:01 am by Neil Wilkof
The state of the register alone is not sufficient evidence – it all comes down to use in the market. [read post]
14 Mar 2024, 6:44 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
The case law is still developing in this area.The case is Whittaker v. [read post]
31 Mar 2015, 11:00 am by Dan Ernst
SchwimmerMegan ThrelkeldJustices Douglas and Whittaker in Meyer v. [read post]
3 Jan 2012, 5:06 am by tracey
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Tim Martin Interiors Ltd v Akin Gump LLP [2011] EWCA Civ 1574 (21 December 2011) Padden v Bevan Ashford Solicitors [2011] EWCA Civ 1616 (21 December 2011) Kinnear v Whittaker [2011] EWCA Civ 1609 (21 December 2011) Q (A Child) [2011] EWCA Civ 1610 (21 December 2011) Delaney v Pickett & Anor [2011] EWCA Civ 1532 (21 December 2011) Lanes Group Plc v Galliford Try Infrastructure Ltd (t/a Galliford Try Rail)… [read post]
31 Jul 2013, 4:37 am by Lorene Park
Indeed, commentators have proclaimed that the policy would spur a “spate” of new suits, starting with Whittaker v America’s Car-Mart, Inc, a complaint filed July 19, 2013 (E.D. [read post]
5 Jun 2014, 2:44 pm by Lisa Whittaker
By Lisa Whittaker Employers who have been concerned about the EEOC’s stance on inflexible maximum leave policies can find some comfort in the Tenth Circuit’s decision in Hwang v. [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 3:08 am by tracey
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Alvi, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] EWCA Civ 681 (09 June 2011) KM, R (on the application of) v Cambridgeshire County Council [2011] EWCA Civ 682 (09 June 2011) Wright (A Child) v Cambridge Medical Group [2011] EWCA Civ 669 (09 June 2011) Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) Stringer v R [2011] EWCA Crim 1396 (09 June 2011) High Court (Administrative Court) E & Ors, R… [read post]
5 Sep 2008, 1:17 pm
  Whittaker was denied the right to grieve the charges by her employer stating that she was precluded from doing so due to the fact that she had chosen to challenge the charges at a hearing and is thus not entitled to pursue the case by way of grievance. [read post]
8 Nov 2023, 4:30 am by Unknown
Whittaker Corp., supra, 289 NLRB at 933 (1988) (quoting Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. v. [read post]
6 Jul 2019, 6:11 am by Vishnu Kannan
Hadley Baker shared appellate briefs from both parties in Trump v. [read post]