Search for: "Whren v. United States" Results 61 - 80 of 148
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Dec 2011, 1:52 pm by Carissa Hessick
  In particular, the court stated: In United States v. [read post]
19 Apr 2021, 5:04 am by David Oscar Markus
” As our country’s experience with stop-and-frisk vividly demonstrates, however, for police, reasonable suspicion is too often synonymous with being a Black or brown person in public.The practice of racially profiling Black drivers was effectively endorsed by the Court in the 1996 ruling in Whren v. [read post]
9 Jan 2014, 2:42 pm by Stephen Bilkis
As the Court of Appeals has explained, where a police officer has probable cause to believe that the driver of an automobile has committed a traffic violation, a stop does not violate the state or federal constitutions and neither the primary motivation of the officer nor a determination of what a reasonable traffic officer would have done under the circumstances is relevant akin to People v Robinson and Whren v United States. [read post]
23 Apr 2007, 9:15 pm
 United States courts generally treat one's home as the closest thing to one's castle, by making  limited exceptions for warrantless home searches. [read post]
23 Apr 2007, 9:15 pm
 United States courts generally treat one's home as the closest thing to one's castle, by making  limited exceptions for warrantless home searches. [read post]