Search for: "Wickard v. Filburn" Results 61 - 80 of 224
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Feb 2024, 10:54 am
 For us we could say it was the opinion in Wickard v. [read post]
19 Aug 2012, 1:52 pm by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Ogden (1824) – suggests, accordingly, that sharp departures from the original understanding of the Commerce Clause occurred long before Wickard v. [read post]
5 Apr 2012, 11:40 am by Mary L. Dudziak
Filburn Roe, principles of institutional integrity, and the rule of stare decisis, we are led to conclude this: the essential holding of Roe v. [read post]
19 Jun 2012, 8:10 am by Lovechilde
TPM’s Sahil Kapur reports that in his forthcoming book, Scalia says the Supreme Court’s 1942 opinion in Wickard v. [read post]
14 Jul 2013, 10:59 am by Jon
Filburn, 317 U.S. 111 (1942), but that case and others to the same effect were wrongly decided, as I have argued in several articles:A defect in the ConstitutionMcCulloch ReduxDiagram of Necessary and Proper ClauseThe original meaning of "carrying into execution"What "commerce" meant to the FramersUnnecessary and ImproperWhat happened with Wickard? [read post]
22 Apr 2015, 7:12 pm by Calvin Massey
  He conceded that a volume limit (perhaps of the sort famously at issue in Wickard v. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 3:01 am by Robert Thomas (inversecondemnation.com)
Filburn, whether choosing not to buy a product or service is participating in commerce, and the Anti-Injunction Act. [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 6:35 am by Ted Frank
First, how can the claim PPACA is unconstitutional be reconciled with Wickard v. [read post]