Search for: "Wiggins v. State" Results 61 - 80 of 164
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Aug 2019, 4:44 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
The plaintiff’s allegations of “intentional harm,” which the Supreme Court properly interpreted as stating a cause of action alleging prima facie tort, were unsupported by facts demonstrating that the defendants acted with “malicious intent or disinterested malevolence” in the prior action (Ahmed Elkoulily, M.D., P.C. v New York State Catholic Healthplan, Inc., 153 AD3d 768, 772 [2017]; see Dorce v Gluck, 140 AD3d 1111, 1112… [read post]
4 Jun 2019, 4:17 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
The plaintiff’s allegations of “intentional harm,” which the Supreme Court properly interpreted as stating a cause of action alleging prima facie tort, were unsupported by facts demonstrating that the defendants acted with “malicious intent or disinterested malevolence” in the prior action (Ahmed Elkoulily, M.D., P.C. v New York State Catholic Healthplan, Inc., 153 AD3d 768, 772 [2017]; see Dorce v Gluck, 140 AD3d 1111, 1112… [read post]
7 Mar 2019, 3:58 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
, 119 AD2d 789 [1986]; see also Wiggin v Gordon, 115 Misc. 2d 1071 [1982]), or for misconduct that is chronic. [read post]
5 Apr 2011, 2:17 pm by Matthew Seligman - Guest
The Court rejected the Ninth Circuit’s reliance on Terry Williams, Wiggins v. [read post]
11 Feb 2014, 7:38 am by Joy Waltemath
Supreme Court has recognized that “exemptions for religious organizations from civil discrimination suits protect religious freedom by avoiding state interference with religious autonomy and practice,” the state high court noted, citing the 1987 decision in Corp. of Presiding Bishop of Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints v. [read post]
19 Apr 2009, 9:09 pm
  In fact, Hasan Simmons has first-hand experience of this scenario, and the loss of one of his jurors because her child was ill is one of the issues in United States v. [read post]
3 Feb 2011, 3:20 am
Citing Wiggins v Board of Education, 60 NY2d 385, the court said that “[i]n the absence of a written delegation authorizing a deputy or other person to conduct the hearing, the removing board or officer has no jurisdiction to discipline an employee. [read post]
31 Jan 2019, 4:17 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
The plaintiff’s allegations of “intentional harm,” which the Supreme Court properly interpreted as stating a cause of action alleging prima facie tort, were unsupported by facts demonstrating that the defendants acted with “malicious intent or disinterested malevolence” in the prior action (Ahmed Elkoulily, M.D., P.C. v New York State Catholic Healthplan, Inc., 153 AD3d 768, 772; see Dorce v Gluck, 140 AD3d 1111,… [read post]
2 Dec 2008, 11:19 am
" However, applying what it termed "a careful reading" of Wiggins v. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 3:51 am
The Circuit Court said that while it did not generally have jurisdiction to review the decisions of the Merit Systems Protection Board, it did have jurisdiction over this type of “mixed case,” citing Wiggins v US Postal Service, 653 F.2d 219. [read post]
1 Sep 2013, 10:04 am by Mark Zamora
Wiggins, 113 Ga. 149 (3) (1884); Bennett v. [read post]