Search for: "Wiggins v. State" Results 81 - 100 of 164
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Jun 2018, 4:35 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Nor do we believe that our decision will lead to unpredictability or confusion given that it reiterates the proposition that bare legal conclusions in a pleading are not entitled to consideration when assessing a motion to dismiss under CPLR 3211 (a) (7) (see Myers v Schneiderman, 30 NY3d 1, 11 [2017]; Connaughton v Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc., 29 NY3d at 141; Maas v Cornell Univ., 94 NY2d 87, 91 [1999]; Rodriguez v Jacoby & Meyers, LLP, 126… [read post]
25 May 2018, 11:00 am by Aurora Barnes
Garza 17-654 Issue: Whether, pursuant to United States v. [read post]
25 Jan 2011, 6:25 am by David Oscar Markus
His cases have ranged from the intricacies of intellectual property, such as his defense of music industry copyrights in 2005, to the complexities of the death penalty, such as his pro bono work in Wiggins v. [read post]
25 Sep 2014, 9:48 am by Christine Prokopick
Grokster, which established that companies building businesses based on the unauthorized distribution of copyrighted works can be liable for inducing infringement; and Wiggins v. [read post]
23 Oct 2017, 11:09 am by Steve Vladeck
After unsuccessfully appealing his conviction and pursuing state collateral review, Ayestas filed a federal habeas petition in 2009, raising a series of claims – including that, under Wiggins v. [read post]
16 Jun 2017, 3:00 am by SOG Staff
Supreme Court apparently is considering whether to hear a case, Wisconsin v. [read post]
1 Dec 2017, 3:06 am by Walter Olson
” [Posner, chief judge, in People Who Care v. [read post]
1 Jul 2019, 2:56 am by Walter Olson
Laws banning truthful business speech about lawful conduct should trip First Amendment review [Ilya Shapiro on Cato amicus brief in Seeberger v. [read post]
27 Sep 2011, 4:30 am
(Editors’ Note: See the CAFA Law Blog analysis of the companion case of Wiggins v. [read post]
27 Sep 2011, 4:30 am
 (Editors’ Note: See the CAFA Law Blog analysis of the companion case of Wiggins v. [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 4:03 am
It is well settled, said the Appellate Division, that absent "a written delegation authorizing a deputy or other person to conduct the hearing," the hearing officer did not have jurisdiction to conduct the §75 disciplinary hearing,  citing Wiggins v Board of Educ. of City of N.Y., 60 NY2d 385, among other decisions. [read post]
22 Apr 2011, 6:18 am by Bill Raftery
The threats to impeach 4 Iowa Supreme Court justices for their same-sex marriage decision (Varnum v. [read post]
27 Dec 2011, 7:07 am by Bill Raftery
Brien Maybe carried over in 2012 Iowa HR 50 Impeachment Supreme Court Justice David Wiggins Same sex marriage decision Varnum v. [read post]