Search for: "Wiggins v. State" Results 121 - 140 of 229
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Oct 2017, 11:09 am by Steve Vladeck
After unsuccessfully appealing his conviction and pursuing state collateral review, Ayestas filed a federal habeas petition in 2009, raising a series of claims – including that, under Wiggins v. [read post]
16 Jun 2017, 3:00 am by SOG Staff
Supreme Court apparently is considering whether to hear a case, Wisconsin v. [read post]
1 Dec 2017, 3:06 am by Walter Olson
” [Posner, chief judge, in People Who Care v. [read post]
1 Jul 2019, 2:56 am by Walter Olson
Laws banning truthful business speech about lawful conduct should trip First Amendment review [Ilya Shapiro on Cato amicus brief in Seeberger v. [read post]
27 Sep 2011, 4:30 am
 (Editors’ Note: See the CAFA Law Blog analysis of the companion case of Wiggins v. [read post]
27 Sep 2011, 4:30 am
 (Editors’ Note: See the CAFA Law Blog analysis of the companion case of Wiggins v. [read post]
28 Aug 2022, 8:06 am by John Floyd
Wiggins: Standby counsel appointed by Court does not violate self-representation right. 1984 Strickland v. [read post]
24 Dec 2023, 6:34 am by Just Security
Cameron (@JasmineDCameron) Trump – Intelligence Community Trump’s States Goals for the U.S. [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 4:03 am
It is well settled, said the Appellate Division, that absent "a written delegation authorizing a deputy or other person to conduct the hearing," the hearing officer did not have jurisdiction to conduct the §75 disciplinary hearing,  citing Wiggins v Board of Educ. of City of N.Y., 60 NY2d 385, among other decisions. [read post]
9 Jun 2010, 11:24 am by Justin Walsh
” Read more: http://www.theolympian.com/2010/06/08/v-print/1265042/trial-lawyer-wants-to-take-on.html#ixzz0qNhHRlYs?? [read post]
27 Dec 2011, 7:07 am by Bill Raftery
Brien Maybe carried over in 2012 Iowa HR 50 Impeachment Supreme Court Justice David Wiggins Same sex marriage decision Varnum v. [read post]
30 Mar 2012, 5:27 pm
The following excerpt from Pope v Wiggins cited by the court is exactly on point: Under §124 of the Constitution (of Mississippi) of 1890, the power to grant pardons and to otherwise extend clemency, after the judicial process whereby one has been convicted of a crime has come to an end, is vested in the governor alone... [read post]