Search for: "Wilbur v. United States" Results 61 - 80 of 82
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 May 2017, 3:15 am by Barry Sookman
Computer and Internet Weekly Updates for 2017-04-29 https://t.co/CaarCmW8l6 -> Ownership of software dispute kills development contract Tremblay-Lavigne v. [read post]
1 Nov 2016, 7:30 am by Graham Webster
The legal point that building on another state’s continental shelf violates UNCLOS (to which, it is always worth noting, the United States is not a party) is arguably very important but strategically secondary. [read post]
10 Oct 2016, 10:25 am by azatty
Matika Wilbur then spoke, presenting her itinerant photo experience with Project 562, which aims to photograph citizens of each federally recognized tribe in the United States (there are now 566). [read post]
13 Jun 2016, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
Exhausting administrative remediesRoss v Blake, USSC, Docket No. 15-339This decision by the United States Supreme Court considered an appeal involving the federal Prison Litigation Reform Act [PLRA], 42 USC 1997e(a) requirement that an inmate exhaust “such administrative remedies as are available” before bringing suit. [read post]
12 Feb 2016, 8:02 am by Lawfare Staff
Abe developed before assuming his current post, envisions a maritime security partnership between Australia, India, Japan, and the United States. [read post]
5 Feb 2016, 7:25 am by Lawfare Staff
  In other news… United States Reuters reports that the United States is open to the possibility of joint FON patrols with the Philippines in the South China Sea. [read post]
11 Apr 2012, 3:42 pm by National Indian Law Library
United States Department of the Interior (trust responsibility)United States v. [read post]
29 Dec 2010, 5:26 pm by Chip Merlin
” The Court, citing case law from the United States Supreme Court, specifically quashed arguments brought by the insurance industry supporting this ban: We reject the contention of amicus curiae that, even if the statute is construed as a prophylactic ban on all solicitation, it is constitutional under the rational employed in Ohralik v. [read post]
30 May 2008, 8:57 am
United States (1983), and Young v. [read post]