Search for: "Wilkinson v. United States" Results 141 - 160 of 209
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Mar 2012, 11:50 am by Ken Kersch
If “cosmic constitutional theory” is defined as a theory of interpretation of a (constitutional) legal text, all judges worthy of the name (and, as Graber appropriately points out, lots of non-judges) engage in it, in the United States, and everywhere. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 12:05 pm by Steve Vladeck
Jack just flagged the Fourth Circuit’s unanimous 39-page opinion throwing out Lebron v. [read post]
14 Jan 2012, 9:00 am by Alan Horowitz
Introduction Depending on how the Court resolves a threshold issue, United States v. [read post]
1 Nov 2011, 3:12 pm by James R. Marsh
The NCPCA Update can be downloaded in full here. by Angela Downes, Meg Garvin, Wanda Lucibello, Alison Wilkinson, Terry Campos, and Hon. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 5:40 am by Alan Rozenshtein
A member of the panel then states that, in her opinion, a Bivens cause of action does not require congressional action, and that the government’s argument relies on United States v. [read post]
20 Aug 2011, 4:00 am
Plaintiffs subsequently appealed from the district court's order granting the United States' motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. [read post]
18 Jan 2011, 11:58 am by Richard Renner
United States Dep’t of Labor, 134 F.3d 1292, 1295 (6th Cir. 1998). [read post]
14 Dec 2010, 10:38 pm by Michael Geist
  In reviewing copying practices in the law library of the Law Society of Upper Canada, the court stated: The fair dealing exception, like other exceptions in the Copyright Act, is a user’s right. [read post]
22 Nov 2010, 9:13 am
Harvie Wilkinson, III, of the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. [read post]
26 Aug 2010, 4:41 am by admin
case=9920447647810688258&q=In+re+Wilkinson,+100+B.R.+315+(Bankr.W.D.Va.+1989&hl=en&as_sdt=80000000000002, where the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Western District of Virginia held that the wife could not exempt an interest in assets titled in husband’s name because the property might be considered marital property subject to equitable distribution under Virginia Code §20.107.3. http://leg1.state.va.us/cgi-bin/legp504.exe? [read post]