Search for: "Will Baude" Results 1 - 20 of 1,010
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Feb 2021, 9:41 am
Supreme Court's "shadow docket" has caught the attention of lawmakers who want to know more about how the justices handle these under-the-radar cases.On Thursday, a House Judiciary subcommittee will hold a hearing on the so-called shadow docket, a name for the cases that don't go through the Supreme Court's normal process of public arguments and signed merits opinions.The shadow docket has drawn increasing scrutiny in the years since constitutional scholar William… [read post]
23 Jan 2021, 4:02 pm by Eugene Volokh
Now Will Baude and I (and others) have argued that in fact the First Amendment inquiry here was substantively misplaced, and coercive contributions that are used for political causes are generally not unconstitutional. [read post]
6 Jan 2021, 6:13 pm by Ilya Somin
In addition to numerous Democrats, advocates include prominent conservatives such as David French, John Podhoretz (who harshly criticized the earlier effort to impeach Trump, and leading legal scholars, such as my co-bloggers Keith Whittington, and (in a joint post) Will Baude, Sam Bray, and Steve Sachs. [read post]
13 Nov 2020, 7:22 am by Will Baude
Will Baude and Stephen Sachs have argued here that the rule is legally misleading, morally misguided, and unscholarly. [read post]
2 Nov 2020, 7:21 pm by Ilya Somin
The doctrine has been severely criticized by legal scholars (including co-blogger Will Baude), and by Supreme Court justices as varied as Clarence Thomas and Sonia Sotomayor. [read post]
2 Nov 2020, 12:00 pm by Daniel Epps
Will Baude, however, shortly thereafter responded with a thoughtful blog post in which he noted that Henderson's piece has "already attracted a ton of criticism" and arguing that the "criticism deserves more scrutiny. [read post]
2 Nov 2020, 7:38 am by willcanderson
William Baude: Non-Originalists Should Spell Out Why They Think Court-Packing is Unconstitutional willcanderson Mon, 11/02/2020 - 09:38 Read more about William Baude: Non-Originalists Should Spell Out Why They Think Court-Packing is Unconstitutional The Volokh Conspiracy Will Baude Why isn't Court-Packing Unconstitutional? [read post]
31 Oct 2020, 3:48 pm by Howard Bashman
And at “The Volokh Conspiracy,” Will Baude has a post titled “Why isn’t Court-Packing Unconstitutional? [read post]
30 Oct 2020, 12:40 pm by Tom Smith
Yet, these rule restrict what substance can be published.This background brings me to Will Baude and Steve Sach's post. [read post]
30 Oct 2020, 12:27 pm by Josh Blackman
This background brings me to Will Baude and Steve Sachs' post. [read post]
25 Oct 2020, 6:20 pm by David Oscar Markus
Law professor William Baude coined it in 2015 to refer unofficially to the body of orders issued by the Supreme Court outside the formal opinions in the 70 or so cases in which it hears oral argument each term. [read post]
22 Oct 2020, 9:15 am by James Romoser
Law professor William Baude coined it in 2015 to refer unofficially to the body of orders issued by the Supreme Court outside the formal opinions in the 70 or so cases in which it hears oral argument each term. [read post]
21 Sep 2020, 5:00 am by Eric Segall
 Some originalists like Professor Randy Barnett think we have a long way to go before the Court truly decides cases in an originalist manner, whereas other originalists like Professors Will Baude and Steve Sachs think originalism is "already our law. [read post]
17 Sep 2020, 2:40 pm by Bridget Crawford
Below the fold are the results of the 2020-2021 Law Professor Twitter Census. [read post]
14 Sep 2020, 10:14 am by aobeso
President Trump William Baude on How to Treat the Powerful Reason [read post]