Search for: "Will Baude"
Results 81 - 100
of 1,335
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Sep 2023, 11:08 pm
A draft law review article taking issue with Baude and Paulsen, co-written by Josh Blackman and Seth Barrett Tilman, entitled Sweeping and Forcing the President into Section 3: A Response to William Baude and Michael Stokes Paulsen makes a good case that what happened on January 6, 2021 was not an "insurrection" and that the Baude/Paulsen reading of Section 3 of the Fourteenth Amendment is wrong. [read post]
15 Sep 2023, 9:58 am
Will Baude Discusses Section Three in Part Two of Podcast qbaron Fri, 09/15/2023 - 11:58 Read more about Will Baude Discusses Section Three in Part Two of Podcast Amarica's Constitution The Two Experts, Part Two - Special Guests William Baude and Michael Stokes Paulsen [read post]
15 Sep 2023, 9:11 am
Will Baude Discusses Section Three on Podcast qbaron Fri, 09/15/2023 - 11:11 Read more about Will Baude Discusses Section Three on Podcast Amarica's Constitution The Two Experts on Section Three - Special Guests William Baude and Michael Stokes Paulsen [read post]
15 Sep 2023, 4:30 am
Josh Blackman and Seth Tillman, however, believe Baude and Paulsen make numerous mistakes on their way to their conclusions and that their article "tells only one side of a complex story. [read post]
13 Sep 2023, 10:08 pm
He is the single most cited young scholar by the Supreme Court, Will Baude, Roberts clerk. [read post]
13 Sep 2023, 5:44 pm
” Blackman and Tillman do make the odd claim that William Baude and Michael Paulsen in their influential article claiming that an originalist reading would disqualify Donald Trump under Section Three and my somewhat less famous (i.e., obscure) blog post “disregard the fact that the debates they cite from the 1860s in support of their position look back to debates from the early Republic. [read post]
13 Sep 2023, 7:11 am
Via Josh Blackman (who has a new draft article with Seth Tillman disputing the originalist account that Will Baude and Michael Stokes Paulsen offered on this question). [read post]
13 Sep 2023, 6:30 am
’” In their article, Baude and Paulsen summarily dismiss our position. [read post]
12 Sep 2023, 7:35 pm
In short, Baude and Paulsen punched a textualist ticket good for one ride on the Trump train. [read post]
12 Sep 2023, 5:10 pm
“Sweeping and Forcing the President into Section 3: A Response to William Baude and Michael Stokes Paulsen. [read post]
11 Sep 2023, 10:24 pm
[A Response to William Baude and Michael Stokes Paulsen ] Seth Barrett Tillman and I wrote a new draft article, titled Sweeping and Forcing the President into Section 3: A Response to William Baude and Michael Stokes Paulsen. [read post]
8 Sep 2023, 12:01 pm
Baude and Paulsen seem to avoid this underlying debate over methodology, asserting an originalist approach from the outset and proceeding from there. [read post]
6 Sep 2023, 11:44 pm
A number of thoughtful scholars including Mark Graber and Gerard Magliocca on this very blog have made the case along with Baude and Paulson that in order to give force to 14.3, state and local decision-makers with the authority to decide who goes on the ballot should exclude Trump from the ballot. [read post]
6 Sep 2023, 2:41 pm
Part of the debate triggered by the article focuses on whether Baude and Paulsen have correctly interpreted key terms such as "insurrection" and "aid or comfort. [read post]
6 Sep 2023, 10:06 am
The Two Experts, Part Two—Special Guests William Baude and Michael Stoke Paulsen We continue our exclusive discussion with the Professors Baude and Paulsen, authors of the bombshell article declaring Trump ineligible for the Presidency. [read post]
4 Sep 2023, 12:18 pm
Any claim that Baude and Paulson have to nonpartisanship is belied by the final sentence of the above. [read post]
3 Sep 2023, 3:51 am
Without regard to whether you accept or reject the argument proffered by Will Baude and Michael Stokes Paulsen, or even Larry Tribe and Judge Luttig, it leaves many questions unanswered. [read post]
31 Aug 2023, 10:40 am
., these posts by Steve Calabresi and Josh Blackman, Judge Michael Luttig's Twitter account, and this paper by Will Baude and Michael Paulsen.) [read post]
30 Aug 2023, 3:44 am
Committed Commentators Payvand Ahdout, University of Virginia School of Law Will Baude, University of Chicago School of Law Zach Clopton, Northwestern Pritzker School of Law David Engstrom, Stanford Law School Nicole Garnett, Notre Dame Law School Dan Rodriguez, Northwestern Pritzker School of Law Miriam Seifter, UW Law School and SDRI Co-Faculty Director Lauren Sudeall, Vanderbilt Law School Rob Yablon, UW Law School and SDRI Co-Faculty Director [read post]
28 Aug 2023, 4:00 am
But I also agree with the Baude/Paulsen/Luttig/Tribe view that Griffin is relatively easy to overcome. [read post]
