Search for: "Will v. Hallock" Results 1 - 17 of 17
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Jul 2008, 8:12 pm
Diana Hallock v Riverhead Central School District Defendant appealed an order from Supreme Court denying its motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, an action to recover damages for personal injuries sustained on a school bus and at school. [read post]
16 May 2013, 2:31 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
It is well settled that a stipulation made by the attorney may bind a client even where it exceeds the attorney's actual authority if the attorney had apparent authority to enter into the stipulation (see Hallock v State of New York, 64 NY2d 224, 231 [1984]). [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 2:37 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
(See Hallock v State of New York, supra; Kelley v Chavez, 33 AD3d 590 [2006]; Town of Clarkstown v M.R.O. [read post]
31 May 2012, 6:12 pm by Jaclene D'Agostino
Indeed, “only where there is cause sufficient to invalidate a contract, such as fraud, collusion, mistake or accident, will a party be relieved of the consequences of a stipulation made during litigation” (Hallock v State of New York, 64 NY2d 224, 230 [1984]). [read post]
3 Dec 2018, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
" The court explained that the stipulation signed by Nobile and the attorney acting on behalf of DOE is binding under general contract principles, citing Hallock v State of New York, 64 NY2d 224, as Nobile failed to show that there was fraud, collusion, mistake or accident with respect to the execution of the settlement by Nobile, or that DOE's counsel lacked DOE's consent to enter into the stipulation. [read post]
3 Dec 2018, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
" The court explained that the stipulation signed by Nobile and the attorney acting on behalf of DOE is binding under general contract principles, citing Hallock v State of New York, 64 NY2d 224, as Nobile failed to show that there was fraud, collusion, mistake or accident with respect to the execution of the settlement by Nobile, or that DOE's counsel lacked DOE's consent to enter into the stipulation. [read post]
9 Sep 2011, 2:33 am
In the words of the court, “[s]tipulations of settlement are favored by the courts and not lightly cast aside,” citing Hallock v State of New York, 64 NY2d 224. [read post]
31 May 2012, 9:01 am by WSLL
Edwards of Stevens, Edwards, Hallock, Carpenter & Phillips, P.C., Gillette, Wyoming.Representing Appellee American National Bank (Defendant /Plaintiff):  Clint A. [read post]
11 May 2010, 1:42 am
Bonnette v Long Island College Hosp., 3 NY3d 281 (2004); Hallock v State of New York, 64 NY2d 224 (1984). [read post]
3 Dec 2015, 6:00 am by Administrator
The first case study is an analysis of various lawyers’ and law firms’ blogs about the 2014 Supreme Court case of Clark v. [read post]