Search for: "Will v. Hallock"
Results 1 - 20
of 23
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Jan 2006, 3:02 am
[JURIST] The US Supreme Court [official website] handed down decisions in three cases Wednesday, including a decision in Will v. [read post]
13 Jan 2023, 9:34 pm
A settlement agreement signed by an attorney may bind a client even where it exceeds the attorney's actual authority, if the attorney had apparent authority to enter into the agreement (see Hallock v State of New York, 64 NY2d 224, 230 [1984]; Popovic v New York City Health & Hosps. [read post]
13 Jan 2023, 9:34 pm
A settlement agreement signed by an attorney may bind a client even where it exceeds the attorney's actual authority, if the attorney had apparent authority to enter into the agreement (see Hallock v State of New York, 64 NY2d 224, 230 [1984]; Popovic v New York City Health & Hosps. [read post]
28 Nov 2005, 3:13 pm
[JURIST] The US Supreme Court [official website; JURIST news archive] on Monday heard oral arguments in Will v. [read post]
16 Jul 2008, 8:12 pm
Diana Hallock v Riverhead Central School District Defendant appealed an order from Supreme Court denying its motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, an action to recover damages for personal injuries sustained on a school bus and at school. [read post]
23 Jul 2009, 4:33 am
The longer answer is found in Hallock v. [read post]
21 Mar 2023, 7:07 am
The Appellate Division, citing Hallock v State of New York, 64 NY2d 224, said that "Stipulations of settlement between parties are binding contracts enforceable by the court and, as such, they are favored and 'not lightly cast aside' ... especially where, as here, the party seeking to set aside the stipulation was represented by counsel. [read post]
21 Mar 2023, 7:07 am
The Appellate Division, citing Hallock v State of New York, 64 NY2d 224, said that "Stipulations of settlement between parties are binding contracts enforceable by the court and, as such, they are favored and 'not lightly cast aside' ... especially where, as here, the party seeking to set aside the stipulation was represented by counsel. [read post]
19 Aug 2013, 3:00 am
In Hallock v. [read post]
19 Aug 2013, 3:00 am
In Hallock v. [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 2:37 am
(See Hallock v State of New York, supra; Kelley v Chavez, 33 AD3d 590 [2006]; Town of Clarkstown v M.R.O. [read post]
3 Dec 2018, 4:00 am
" The court explained that the stipulation signed by Nobile and the attorney acting on behalf of DOE is binding under general contract principles, citing Hallock v State of New York, 64 NY2d 224, as Nobile failed to show that there was fraud, collusion, mistake or accident with respect to the execution of the settlement by Nobile, or that DOE's counsel lacked DOE's consent to enter into the stipulation. [read post]
3 Dec 2018, 4:00 am
" The court explained that the stipulation signed by Nobile and the attorney acting on behalf of DOE is binding under general contract principles, citing Hallock v State of New York, 64 NY2d 224, as Nobile failed to show that there was fraud, collusion, mistake or accident with respect to the execution of the settlement by Nobile, or that DOE's counsel lacked DOE's consent to enter into the stipulation. [read post]
9 Sep 2011, 2:33 am
In the words of the court, “[s]tipulations of settlement are favored by the courts and not lightly cast aside,” citing Hallock v State of New York, 64 NY2d 224. [read post]
17 Feb 2011, 5:48 pm
Hallock, 309 U.S. 106, 119 (1940). [read post]
29 Apr 2020, 8:11 am
” Hallock v. [read post]
6 Aug 2014, 10:55 am
Saylor, Peter Hallock, Edwin J. [read post]
31 May 2012, 9:01 am
Edwards of Stevens, Edwards, Hallock, Carpenter & Phillips, P.C., Gillette, Wyoming.Representing Appellee American National Bank (Defendant /Plaintiff): Clint A. [read post]
28 Jun 2007, 8:22 pm
Hallock, 309 U. [read post]
3 Jan 2008, 5:28 am
Billingsley and Owsley v. [read post]
