Search for: "Will v. Michigan Dept. of State Police" Results 1 - 20 of 33
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Dec 2011, 11:25 am
This would appear to have violated the Fourth Amendment under the rule announced in Michigan Dept. of State Police v. [read post]
20 Mar 2018, 2:00 am
 The Supreme Court held in its seminal case of Michigan Dept. of State Police v. [read post]
3 Oct 2010, 11:47 pm
The decision notes that “neither a State nor its officials acting in their official capacities are ‘persons’ under Section 1983,” citing Will v Michigan Department of State Police, 491 U.S. 58.Evans also ran in a wall in her effort to sue certain named officials “in their respective personal capacities. [read post]
9 Jul 2013, 12:12 pm by Appelman Law Firm
However, the Supreme Court reversed course in Michigan Dept. of State Police v. [read post]
9 Jul 2013, 12:12 pm by Appelman Law Firm
However, the Supreme Court reversed course in Michigan Dept. of State Police v. [read post]
3 Dec 2015, 9:10 am by Evan M. Levow
Supreme Court’s 1990 decision in Michigan Dept. of State Police v. [read post]
21 Dec 2016, 6:17 pm by Evan M. Levow
Supreme Court, however, affirmed the constitutionality of this practice in a 1990 decision, Michigan Dept. of State Police v. [read post]
21 Dec 2016, 6:17 pm by Evan M. Levow
Supreme Court, however, affirmed the constitutionality of this practice in a 1990 decision, Michigan Dept. of State Police v. [read post]
27 Oct 2013, 2:31 pm by Stephen Bilkis
People v Scott, Michigan Dept of State Police v Sitz, Indianapolis v Edmond, People v Jackson and People v Trotter settled that a roadblock or checkpoint stop is a seizure within the meaning of the Fourth Amendment. [read post]
24 Aug 2012, 2:22 pm
This is because the United States Supreme Court determined in Michigan Dept. of State Police v. [read post]