Search for: "Will v. Michigan Dept. of State Police"
Results 1 - 20
of 62
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jun 2023, 1:14 pm
Michigan Dept. of Corrections: We're not going to let you register as a religion. [read post]
22 Jun 2023, 11:40 am
From Judge Mark Goldsmith's opinion in Hernden v. [read post]
30 Sep 2022, 12:30 pm
New cert petition: Anthony Novak was jailed for four days and prosecuted for making a fake Facebook page satirizing the Parma, Ohio police dept. [read post]
23 Sep 2022, 4:30 am
Michigan Dept of State Police to exclude a state from the meaning of the word "person. [read post]
23 Sep 2022, 4:00 am
Spending in election cycles by corporations and the ultrawealthy through so-called dark money groups has skyrocketed since the 2010 Supreme Court decision Citizens United v. [read post]
9 Sep 2022, 12:30 pm
New on the Short Circuit podcast: A landmark, watershed, and very salubrious ruling from the Michigan Supreme Court on implied rights of action under the state constitution. [read post]
26 Aug 2022, 4:00 am
Justice Dept. [read post]
29 Jul 2022, 4:00 am
Justice Dept. [read post]
8 Jul 2022, 4:00 am
The majority in Dobbs v. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 9:02 pm
"[F]ederal constitutional claims may not be asserted in the Court of Claims, given that the statutory basis for such claims, 42 USC § 1983, authorizes claims only against a 'person' and defendant is not a person within the meaning of this statute" (Oppenheimer v State of New York, 152 AD3d 1006, 1008 [2017]; accord Moreland v State of New York, 200 AD3d 1362, 1365 [2021], lv denied 38 NY3d 906 [2022]; see Will v Michigan… [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 9:02 pm
"[F]ederal constitutional claims may not be asserted in the Court of Claims, given that the statutory basis for such claims, 42 USC § 1983, authorizes claims only against a 'person' and defendant is not a person within the meaning of this statute" (Oppenheimer v State of New York, 152 AD3d 1006, 1008 [2017]; accord Moreland v State of New York, 200 AD3d 1362, 1365 [2021], lv denied 38 NY3d 906 [2022]; see Will v Michigan… [read post]
11 Feb 2022, 3:00 am
National Archives Asks Justice Dept. to Investigate Trump’s Handling of White House Records MSN – Matt Zapotosky, Jacqueline Alemany, Ashley Parker, and Josh Dawsey (Washington Post) | Published: 2/9/2022 The National Archives and Records Administration asked the Justice Department to examine Donald Trump’s handling of White House records. [read post]
21 Jan 2022, 3:00 am
The Justice Dept. [read post]
27 Dec 2019, 12:30 pm
Espinoza v. [read post]
5 Nov 2019, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court evaluated sobriety checkpoints (at which everyone must stop and submit to observation and answer some questions) under the Fourth Amendment right against unreasonable seizures, Justice Stevens, in Michigan Dept. of State Police v. [read post]
24 Aug 2019, 6:30 am
This event is closed to the public.Student Presenters:Jonathon Booth, Harvard University (jonathonbooth@g.harvard.edu) The Birth of Policing in Post-Emancipation JamaicaLauren Feldman, Johns Hopkins University (lauren.feldman@jhu.edu) Constructing Legal Matrimony and the State in New York and the United States: Debating New York's Marriage Act of 1827 and its EffectsJamie Grischkan, Boston University (jgrisch@bu.edu) Banking, Law, and American… [read post]
6 Aug 2019, 2:36 pm
The argument that a DUI checkpoint violates the fourth amendment was shut down in the Supreme court case Michigan Dept. of State Police v. [read post]
22 Jun 2017, 1:58 pm
Citing the 1978 case Monell v. [read post]
21 Dec 2016, 6:17 pm
Supreme Court, however, affirmed the constitutionality of this practice in a 1990 decision, Michigan Dept. of State Police v. [read post]
21 Dec 2016, 6:17 pm
Supreme Court, however, affirmed the constitutionality of this practice in a 1990 decision, Michigan Dept. of State Police v. [read post]
