Search for: "William Baude, guest-blogging"
Results 1 - 19
of 19
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Dec 2011, 4:03 pm
(Eugene Volokh) I’m delighted to report that Wiliiam Baude will be guest-blogging for us this coming week. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 3:32 pm
(William Baude, guest-blogging) A number of commenters have asked about the relationship between law and marriage. [read post]
14 Dec 2011, 5:53 pm
(William Baude, guest-blogging) Before we dive deeper into the federal cases I blogged about this morning, I thought it would be helpful to clarify a point featured in several comments. [read post]
16 Dec 2011, 8:19 pm
(William Baude, guest-blogging) Amidst all of my many posts about what federal courts should do if DOMA is struck down, I thought I should say a little bit about Congress. [read post]
18 Dec 2011, 10:19 am
(William Baude, guest-blogging) Before I go, I wanted to leave you with a few thoughts about these legal issues that go beyond the issue of DOMA and same-sex marriage. [read post]
16 Dec 2011, 12:01 pm
(William Baude, guest-blogging) Before I get to the last phase of my stint here, I thought it would be helpful for me to address one recurring theme in the comments. [read post]
13 Dec 2011, 10:41 am
(William Baude, guest-blogging) Here are a few follow-up questions to my first post this morning. [read post]
13 Dec 2011, 6:14 am
(William Baude, guest-blogging) So we’ve established that in a world without DOMA, state law is the natural place to look to figure out whether a same-sex couple is married. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 10:45 am
(William Baude, guest-blogging) Yesterday I outlined the three different ways that courts have dealt with the concept of marriage in federal statutes. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 5:15 am
(William Baude, guest-blogging) Thanks to Eugene and the conspiracy for having me here. [read post]
12 Mar 2018, 9:06 am
I would assume Professor Blackman does not need too much of an introduction to the VC readership, as he has repeatedly guest-blogged in our pages. [read post]
16 Dec 2011, 3:05 pm
(William Baude, guest-blogging) So I’ve explained why I reject two of the three possible approaches that federal courts take to the marital choice of law problem. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 11:03 pm
(William Baude, guest-blogging) So earlier this morning (yesterday, Eastern Time, which apparently governs the Volokh Conspiracy), I explained why the federal government does indeed need to look in large part to state law when it tries to figure out whether a couple is married. [read post]
14 Dec 2011, 10:26 am
(William Baude, guest-blogging) So states have different rules about who can get married, and states also have different rules about which state’s law to look to when a same-sex couple moves around the country. [read post]
9 Sep 2021, 5:02 am
” The “shadow docket” is a phrase coined by William Baude, a professor at the University of Chicago Law School, to describe the use of emergency orders and summary decisions by the Supreme Court without full briefing and oral argument. [read post]
11 Apr 2014, 4:39 am
Briefly: Also at The Volokh Conspiracy, William Baude discusses what he describes as “a neglected cert. petition on a very troubling issue,” in Williams v. [read post]
6 Jan 2023, 8:01 am
In the course of my reading through that conversation, two posts in particular got my wheels turning as a law librarian and professor, leading me to develop this course: a column in the Washington Post by William Baude and a post by Olivia Smith Schlinck on the RIPS blog for law librarians. [read post]
2 Feb 2010, 11:25 am
All that blog needed was a little respect!) [read post]
2 Feb 2010, 11:25 am
All that blog needed was a little respect!) [read post]
