Search for: "William Baude" Results 181 - 200 of 372
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Jan 2019, 7:31 am by First Mondays
We’ve got a breather between sittings, so Professor Stephen Sachs joins us as we recap an opinion, take a look at some grants and orders, discuss whether law school clinics are good or bad ideas, and ask a lot of questions about his and Professor William Baude’s amicus brief in Franchise Tax Board of California v. [read post]
14 Jan 2014, 5:15 am by Walter Olson
Explainers by Trevor Burrus and William Baude at Forbes and by Nina Totenberg at NPR . [read post]
3 Dec 2018, 3:30 am by Sam Krauss
William Baude and Ryan Doerfler, Arguing with Friends, 117 Mich. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 3:32 pm by William Baude, guest-blogging
(William Baude, guest-blogging) A number of commenters have asked about the relationship between law and marriage. [read post]
13 Sep 2023, 6:30 am by ernst
In a new article, William Baude and Michael Stokes Paulsen argue that the answer is yes because “essentially all the evidence concerning the original textual meaning of Section Three . . . points in the same direction . . . . [read post]
16 May 2014, 7:00 am by Dan Filler
Thanks to Will Baude, over at VC, for posting some of Justice Scalia's comments in his William & Mary College of Law graduation address. [read post]
18 Dec 2011, 10:19 am by William Baude, guest-blogging
(William Baude, guest-blogging) Before I go, I wanted to leave you with a few thoughts about these legal issues that go beyond the issue of DOMA and same-sex marriage. [read post]
16 Dec 2011, 8:19 pm by William Baude, guest-blogging
(William Baude, guest-blogging) Amidst all of my many posts about what federal courts should do if DOMA is struck down, I thought I should say a little bit about Congress. [read post]
14 Dec 2011, 5:53 pm by William Baude, guest-blogging
(William Baude, guest-blogging) Before we dive deeper into the federal cases I blogged about this morning, I thought it would be helpful to clarify a point featured in several comments. [read post]
20 Jun 2016, 9:54 am
In a new article, William Baude and Stephen Sachs claim that "interpretive rules are conceptually possible, normatively sensible, and actually part of our legal system. [read post]
21 May 2016, 2:58 pm by Jon
My first candidates would be Randy Barnett Roger Pilon Janice Rogers Brown Alex Kozinski David Sentelle William Baude Larry Becraft Stephen Calabresi Elizabeth Price Foley Michaek Greve Kurt Lash Gary Larson Andrew Napolitano Robert Natelson Roger Roots Lawrence Solum These are taken from http://constitution.org/cs_peopl.htm , not including some who are social conservative or too old. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 3:01 am by Walter Olson
Supreme Court reconvenes for new term and tomorrow will hear cases over whether Title VII ban on sex discrimination extends to sexual orientation and gender identity [SCOTUSBlog symposium with contributors including Richard Epstein, William Eskridge; Will Baude, Volokh Conspiracy; George Will; earlier here, here, here, etc.] [read post]
4 Feb 2015, 5:49 am by Amy Howe
In an op-ed for The New York Times, William Baude urges the Court to provide more information regarding the orders that it issues, arguing that, with “[t]he court . . . in the spotlight more and more, “[t]ransparency in all its decisions is vital to its continued legitimacy. [read post]
22 May 2022, 5:53 pm by Christopher J. Walker
Severability First Principles by William Baude (109 Virginia Law Review forthcoming)An Overview of Privacy Law in 2022 by Daniel J. [read post]
15 Jul 2011, 7:37 am by Kent Scheidegger
William Baude of Robbins, Russell has this article on SSRN on the actual innocence problem, with particular reference to the Troy Davis case. [read post]
10 Aug 2023, 8:50 pm by Sabrina I. Pacifici
Baude, William and Paulsen, Michael Stokes, The Sweep and Force of Section Three (August 9, 2023). [read post]
24 Jul 2023, 5:27 am by Will Baude
In a post last month, Professor William Baude joined a growing body of lawyers, judges, and commentators who have come upon a long-overlooked yet "game-changing" clause in the original text of 42 U.S.C. [read post]