Search for: "William Baude"
Results 201 - 220
of 402
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Jul 2023, 5:27 am
In a post last month, Professor William Baude joined a growing body of lawyers, judges, and commentators who have come upon a long-overlooked yet "game-changing" clause in the original text of 42 U.S.C. [read post]
27 May 2014, 11:17 am
“But there has to be some kind of momentum effect” to the string of nearly identical rulings, said William Baude, a former clerk to Chief Justice John G. [read post]
29 Sep 2016, 12:46 pm
My recent post about the inconsistent verdicts error in the presentation of the Bravo-Fernandez case led to some interesting and illuminating exchanges, some on Twitter (with William Baude and Dan Epps and Carissa Hessick) and some offline. [read post]
1 Apr 2015, 7:51 am
William Baude covered the decision for this blog, with other coverage coming from NPR’s Nina Totenberg, David Savage of the Los Angeles Times, and Jess Bravin of The Wall Street Journal. [read post]
16 Dec 2011, 12:01 pm
(William Baude, guest-blogging) Before I get to the last phase of my stint here, I thought it would be helpful for me to address one recurring theme in the comments. [read post]
10 Aug 2013, 8:49 am
We here at the Law Blogger agree with Stanford Law Fellow William Baude's take on the issue, for the Volokh Conspiracy blog:But the [SSA's policy] decision has the unfortunate effect of ensuring that same-sex couples will be married for some federal purposes and not for others. [read post]
30 Oct 2013, 12:49 pm
William Baude will be the Neubauer Family Assistant Professor of Law at the University of Chicago beginning next year. [read post]
21 Mar 2017, 9:05 pm
Gorsuch hearing “unlikely to change a single vote on anything” [Ilya Shapiro] “No, there is no way to force Supreme Court nominees to give revealing answers” [Orin Kerr] Members of Supreme Court bar are keen on the nominee [letter courtesy SCOTUSblog] And many law professors, even [letter via Will Baude] “Nice Try! [read post]
13 Dec 2011, 6:14 am
(William Baude, guest-blogging) So we’ve established that in a world without DOMA, state law is the natural place to look to figure out whether a same-sex couple is married. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 10:45 am
(William Baude, guest-blogging) Yesterday I outlined the three different ways that courts have dealt with the concept of marriage in federal statutes. [read post]
13 Dec 2011, 10:41 am
(William Baude, guest-blogging) Here are a few follow-up questions to my first post this morning. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 5:15 am
(William Baude, guest-blogging) Thanks to Eugene and the conspiracy for having me here. [read post]
12 Aug 2022, 9:30 pm
" Also in the Washington Post (opinion pages): William Baude (Stanford Law School), "Of course the Supreme Court needs to use history. [read post]
17 Feb 2021, 9:41 am
Supreme Court's "shadow docket" has caught the attention of lawmakers who want to know more about how the justices handle these under-the-radar cases.On Thursday, a House Judiciary subcommittee will hold a hearing on the so-called shadow docket, a name for the cases that don't go through the Supreme Court's normal process of public arguments and signed merits opinions.The shadow docket has drawn increasing scrutiny in the years since constitutional scholar William… [read post]
16 Apr 2015, 2:45 pm
William Baude, University of Chicago Law School Mr. [read post]
12 Mar 2018, 9:06 am
Professor Blackman joins an illustrious list of former award winners, including several Conspirators (Randy Barnett, Eugene Volokh, Orin Kerr, Paul Cassell, Eugene Kontorovich, Nita Fahrany, William Baude, and some other guy). [read post]
16 Apr 2015, 2:45 pm
William Baude, University of Chicago Law School Mr. [read post]
10 Mar 2023, 3:30 am
” William Baude asked in widely cited 2015 Columbia Law Review article. [read post]
31 Oct 2018, 8:00 am
But it is not obvious what those implications are, and, as both Jack Balkin and William Baude indicate, they could vary (and perhaps dramatically) depending upon which kind of originalist one is. [read post]
8 Sep 2023, 12:01 pm
William Baude and Michael Stokes Paulsen have written a recent article, "The Sweep and Force of Section Three," in which they argue that Section Three of the Fourteenth Amendment is a self-executing provision that renders Donald Trump ineligible for the presidency as a result of his role in attempting to overthrow the results of the 2020 election.The article has been the talk of both legal academia and the wider public in recent weeks, drawing a great deal of attention… [read post]
