Search for: "William Baude"
Results 281 - 300
of 372
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Oct 2018, 6:00 am
You can reach him by e-mail at baude@uchicago.edu [read post]
19 May 2017, 12:56 pm
William Baude is Neubauer Family Assistant Professor of Law at the University of Chicago Law School. [read post]
19 Oct 2023, 9:01 pm
Baude and Paulsen spend a majority of their 126-page law review article explaining why Section 3 must be self-executing. [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 4:30 am
" Six months ago, William Baude and Michael Stokes Paulsen made headlines by publishing an article on SSRN, The Sweep and Force of Section Three, in which they argued that Donald Trump’s actions on January 6, 2021 qualified as an insurrection and that Section 3 therefore disqualified him from being elected President again. [read post]
12 Sep 2019, 3:30 am
In the former category are Bernadette Meyler’s powerful critique of the Supreme Court’s reading of the history of the Sixth Amendment’s Confrontation Clause; Saul Cornell’s challenge to originalists to meet the standards of a“genuinely historical approach to reading Founding Era texts that draws on the best interdisciplinary methods available”;1 William Baude and Stephen E. [read post]
9 Apr 2018, 2:00 pm
As Professor William Baude explains, “[t]he doctrine of qualified immunity prevents government agents from being held personally liable for constitutional violations unless the violation was of ‘clearly established’ law. [read post]
25 Oct 2020, 6:20 pm
Law professor William Baude coined it in 2015 to refer unofficially to the body of orders issued by the Supreme Court outside the formal opinions in the 70 or so cases in which it hears oral argument each term. [read post]
19 Sep 2018, 1:31 pm
Damian Williams (Yale 2007 / Garland), AUSA, S.D.N.Y. [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 12:05 pm
William Baude, Is Originalism Our Law? [read post]
9 Apr 2021, 10:27 am
Kang, William G. and Virginia K. [read post]
18 Sep 2023, 3:44 pm
In August, two prominent legal scholars who are members of the conservative judicial group the Federalist Society, William Baude and Michael Stokes Paulsen, suggested that Section Three of the Fourteenth Amendment clearly bars Trump from running for reelection. [read post]
28 Aug 2014, 4:20 am
At The Volokh Conspiracy, William Baude discusses Jones v. [read post]
17 Oct 2021, 4:40 pm
“I think this draft goes much farther in a dangerous direction than it should,” William Baude, a law professor at the University of Chicago, said. [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 7:15 pm
Commentary comes from Noah Feldman of Bloomberg View, Garrett Epps at The Atlantic, Orin Kerr of the Volokh Conspiracy, Ilya Shapiro at the Cato Institute, Jim Harper at the Cato Institute, Eric Posner at Slate, Ian Millhiser at Think Progress, Charles Cooke at National Review, Will Baude at the Volokh Conspiracy, Andrea Peterson at The Washington Post, Doug Kendall at The Washington Post, and Hadar Aviram at PrawfsBlawg. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 3:11 pm
Truly amazing that more than a hundred thousand people would turn out, week after week, to chant "democrati" in the name of defending a court from politics. pic.twitter.com/EPinYVERug — William Baude (@WilliamBaude) June 18, 2023 In our subsequent discussion of Haaland v. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 2:41 pm
Two scholars who are not here are William Baude of the University of Chicago law school and Michael Stokes Paulsen of the University of St. [read post]
2 Oct 2023, 9:01 pm
”William Baude, who teaches law at the University of Chicago, disagrees with Hollis-Brusky’s assessment. [read post]
18 Oct 2007, 9:01 am
Jim Hawkins, Renting the Good Life, William & Mary Law Review, Vol. 49, forthcoming 2008. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 4:07 am
As William Baude explains in his preview for this blog, the Court will consider “whether the Supremacy Clause of the Constitution gives plaintiffs a cause of action to enjoin state action as preempted, even when the preempting statute does not. [read post]
2 Oct 2022, 1:11 pm
" That's the adjective that University of Chicago law professor William Baude applies to this court, and in his view, that's not a bad thing. [read post]
