Search for: "William Baude"
Results 21 - 40
of 402
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Oct 2023, 9:01 pm
Baude and Paulsen spend a majority of their 126-page law review article explaining why Section 3 must be self-executing. [read post]
2 Oct 2023, 9:01 pm
”William Baude, who teaches law at the University of Chicago, disagrees with Hollis-Brusky’s assessment. [read post]
18 Sep 2023, 3:44 pm
In August, two prominent legal scholars who are members of the conservative judicial group the Federalist Society, William Baude and Michael Stokes Paulsen, suggested that Section Three of the Fourteenth Amendment clearly bars Trump from running for reelection. [read post]
15 Sep 2023, 11:08 pm
A draft law review article taking issue with Baude and Paulsen, co-written by Josh Blackman and Seth Barrett Tilman, entitled Sweeping and Forcing the President into Section 3: A Response to William Baude and Michael Stokes Paulsen makes a good case that what happened on January 6, 2021 was not an "insurrection" and that the Baude/Paulsen reading of Section 3 of the Fourteenth Amendment is wrong. [read post]
15 Sep 2023, 9:58 am
Will Baude Discusses Section Three in Part Two of Podcast qbaron Fri, 09/15/2023 - 11:58 Read more about Will Baude Discusses Section Three in Part Two of Podcast Amarica's Constitution The Two Experts, Part Two - Special Guests William Baude and Michael Stokes Paulsen [read post]
15 Sep 2023, 9:11 am
Will Baude Discusses Section Three on Podcast qbaron Fri, 09/15/2023 - 11:11 Read more about Will Baude Discusses Section Three on Podcast Amarica's Constitution The Two Experts on Section Three - Special Guests William Baude and Michael Stokes Paulsen [read post]
13 Sep 2023, 5:44 pm
” Blackman and Tillman do make the odd claim that William Baude and Michael Paulsen in their influential article claiming that an originalist reading would disqualify Donald Trump under Section Three and my somewhat less famous (i.e., obscure) blog post “disregard the fact that the debates they cite from the 1860s in support of their position look back to debates from the early Republic. [read post]
13 Sep 2023, 6:30 am
In a new article, William Baude and Michael Stokes Paulsen argue that the answer is yes because “essentially all the evidence concerning the original textual meaning of Section Three . . . points in the same direction . . . . [read post]
12 Sep 2023, 5:10 pm
“Sweeping and Forcing the President into Section 3: A Response to William Baude and Michael Stokes Paulsen. [read post]
11 Sep 2023, 10:24 pm
[A Response to William Baude and Michael Stokes Paulsen ] Seth Barrett Tillman and I wrote a new draft article, titled Sweeping and Forcing the President into Section 3: A Response to William Baude and Michael Stokes Paulsen. [read post]
8 Sep 2023, 12:01 pm
William Baude and Michael Stokes Paulsen have written a recent article, "The Sweep and Force of Section Three," in which they argue that Section Three of the Fourteenth Amendment is a self-executing provision that renders Donald Trump ineligible for the presidency as a result of his role in attempting to overthrow the results of the 2020 election.The article has been the talk of both legal academia and the wider public in recent weeks, drawing a great deal of attention… [read post]
6 Sep 2023, 2:41 pm
" In a much-discussed new article, prominent conservative originalist legal scholars William Baude and Michael Stokes Paulsen argue that this rule is broad enough to bar Trump because of his efforts to overturn the result of the 2020 election and his role in instigating the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the Capitol…. [read post]
6 Sep 2023, 10:06 am
The Two Experts, Part Two—Special Guests William Baude and Michael Stoke Paulsen We continue our exclusive discussion with the Professors Baude and Paulsen, authors of the bombshell article declaring Trump ineligible for the Presidency. [read post]
28 Aug 2023, 4:00 am
" So say Professors William Baude and Michael Paulsen, as well as Judge Michael Luttig and Professor Laurence Tribe. [read post]
23 Aug 2023, 6:32 pm
The professors, William Baude and Michael Stokes Paulsen, make the case that unless Congress grants Trump amnesty, he cannot run for or hold the office of the Presidency again because of his behavior surrounding the events of January 6th. [read post]
22 Aug 2023, 6:06 am
The authors are two highly conservative, leading legal scholars, William Baude and Michael Stokes Paulsen. [read post]
21 Aug 2023, 9:14 am
The evidence laid out by the legal scholars William Baude and Michael Stokes Paulsen in “The Sweep and Force of Section Three,” available as a preprint, is momentous. [read post]
21 Aug 2023, 4:00 am
Indeed, conservative scholars William Baude and Michael Stokes Paulsen have argued for the interpretation and insist in a recent law review article that “the case is not even close. [read post]
21 Aug 2023, 3:53 am
” The article, written by William Baude of the University ion Chicago Law School, long known as a conservative law school, and Michael Stokes Paulsen of the University of St. [read post]
20 Aug 2023, 3:07 pm
Last week, law professors William Baude of the University of Chicago and Michael Stokes Paulsen of the University of St. [read post]
