Search for: "William Baude"
Results 141 - 160
of 417
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Apr 2021, 6:44 pm
Corlett, and a possible trip to Hawaii”: William Baude has this post at the “Summary, Judgment” blog. [read post]
16 Apr 2021, 9:30 pm
Baude, Alison L. [read post]
13 Apr 2021, 6:16 am
They are: Michelle Adams (Cardozo); Kate Andrias (Michigan); Jack Balkin, Justin Driver, Heather Gerken, and Cristina Rodriguez (all Yale); William Baude, Alison LaCroix, and David... [read post]
9 Apr 2021, 10:27 am
Kang, William G. and Virginia K. [read post]
9 Apr 2021, 10:00 am
Third, there are seven members who are right of center–including two of my fellow co-bloggers: Right: William Baude (Chicago), Jack Goldsmith (Harvard), Thomas B. [read post]
23 Mar 2021, 12:22 pm
“Episode 254: Unfair laws / Why judges should be originalists (William Baude). [read post]
17 Feb 2021, 9:41 am
Supreme Court's "shadow docket" has caught the attention of lawmakers who want to know more about how the justices handle these under-the-radar cases.On Thursday, a House Judiciary subcommittee will hold a hearing on the so-called shadow docket, a name for the cases that don't go through the Supreme Court's normal process of public arguments and signed merits opinions.The shadow docket has drawn increasing scrutiny in the years since constitutional scholar William… [read post]
15 Jan 2021, 7:27 am
William Baude: Does the Chief Justice Preside over an Ex-President's Impeachment Trial? [read post]
2 Nov 2020, 7:38 am
William Baude: Non-Originalists Should Spell Out Why They Think Court-Packing is Unconstitutional willcanderson Mon, 11/02/2020 - 09:38 Read more about William Baude: Non-Originalists Should Spell Out Why They Think Court-Packing is Unconstitutional The Volokh Conspiracy Will Baude Why isn't Court-Packing Unconstitutional? [read post]
25 Oct 2020, 6:20 pm
Law professor William Baude coined it in 2015 to refer unofficially to the body of orders issued by the Supreme Court outside the formal opinions in the 70 or so cases in which it hears oral argument each term. [read post]
22 Oct 2020, 9:15 am
Law professor William Baude coined it in 2015 to refer unofficially to the body of orders issued by the Supreme Court outside the formal opinions in the 70 or so cases in which it hears oral argument each term. [read post]
22 Sep 2020, 11:46 am
William Baude, Farah Peterson & Stephen Sachs: "How Do We Interpret the Constitution? [read post]
17 Sep 2020, 2:40 pm
Johnson ProfMEJohnson1 Baltimore Clinical Teaching Robert Knowles ProfKnowles Baltimore Civil Procedure National Security Law Colin Starger ColinStarger Baltimore Nadia Ahmad nadiabahmad Barry Property Environmental Law Corporate Law Wes Henricksen Henricksen Barry Torts Health Law Environmental Loren Mulraine LorenMulraine Belmont Entertainment Law Media Law Intellectual property Jeffrey Usman Prawfish Belmont … [read post]
14 Sep 2020, 10:14 am
President Trump William Baude on How to Treat the Powerful Reason [read post]
28 Aug 2020, 10:23 pm
William Marbury could not be reached for comment. [read post]
18 Aug 2020, 8:50 am
Policing William Baude and Craig Futterman, "Civil Lawsuits and Qualified Immunity" University of Chicago Law School Discussion Series on Policing [read post]
11 Aug 2020, 4:46 pm
William Baude's "Shadow Docket" and Recent Supreme Court Decisions, Explained aobeso Tue, 08/11/2020 - 18:46 Read more about William Baude's "Shadow Docket" and Recent Supreme Court Decisions, Explained Vox Ian Millhiser The judiciary The Supreme Court’s enigmatic “shadow docket,” explained [read post]
3 Aug 2020, 3:12 pm
William Baude says yes in this Washington Post article and Josh Blackman argues no in this Newsweek piece. [read post]
27 Jul 2020, 9:29 am
William Baude on the Origins of Qualified Immunity willcanderson Mon, 07/27/2020 - 11:29 Read more about William Baude on the Origins of Qualified Immunity Bloomberg Law Andrew Satter Policing Qualified Immunity: Origins of a Police Liability Shield (Video) [read post]
17 Jul 2020, 9:46 am
In the footnotes I mention the idea, advanced recently by William Baude and Stephen Sachs, that Brownwas in fact an originalist decision despite the Court’s apparent determination that historical evidence (a more neutral term than originalism) was no help.Baude and Sachs evidently disagree with my argument about Brown, but for all the work they have done to this point, it is not clear why. [read post]
