Search for: "Williams v. AT & T Wireless Services, Inc."
Results 1 - 20
of 33
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Nov 2019, 3:04 am
Thread Group, Inc. , Cancellation No. 92065499 [Petition for cancellation of a registration for the mark THREAD for "Computer services, namely, providing an Internet site featuring technology facilitating wired and wireless communication among electronic and computer device" on the ground that the registration is void ab initio because the mark was not in use as of the date of Registrant's Statement of Use.December 10, 2019 - 11 AM: Sky International AG… [read post]
15 Nov 2016, 3:24 am
[Isn't it functional? [read post]
13 Jul 2011, 5:00 am
AT & T Wireless Services, Inc., 195 Cal.App.4th 932 (Apr. 25, 2011; pub. ord. [read post]
3 Mar 2014, 11:10 am
See, Rogers Communications Inc. v. [read post]
27 Feb 2014, 10:10 am
So why shouldn’t we worry? [read post]
13 May 2010, 2:28 am
Skyhook Wireless Inc. v. [read post]
3 Aug 2016, 3:51 pm
United Parcel Service, 2011 N.J. [read post]
3 Aug 2016, 3:51 pm
United Parcel Service, 2011 N.J. [read post]
6 Apr 2017, 8:00 am
See Williams v. [read post]
19 Oct 2015, 4:00 am
Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc. [read post]
2 Nov 2010, 11:33 am
The defendants included the carriers Nextel, Sprint, Verizon Wireless, Virgin, as well as third-party merchants and service providers including Motricity, Inc., Flycell, Inc., Glispa, LLC, Thumbplay, Inc., R&D Media North Americas B.V. d/b/a Glomobi, Mobilefunster, c., CSW Group Ltd., and WebAMG Holdings Limited. [read post]
2 Jan 2013, 3:17 pm
All American Security Services, Inc. [read post]
22 Dec 2016, 4:20 am
The CAFC-noted exceptions don't apply. [read post]
4 Apr 2018, 10:30 pm
Lawson Rock & Oil, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 12:57 pm
” Matrixx Initiatives, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 11:47 am
He quotes Justice Felix Frankfurter, from Northwest Airlines Inc. v. [read post]
17 Aug 2009, 10:44 am
(Holliston, MA; Lawrence Sloane, President) B&T Fire Sprinkler Inc. [read post]
9 Jan 2009, 7:00 am
Volkswagon-based transfer mandamus order in In re TS Tech USA (Inventive Step) (Hal Wegner) (EDTexweblog.com) (EDTexweblog.com) (Washington State Patent Law Blog) (Patently-O) (Law360) (Patent Prospector) ECJ decides Obelix too famous to be confused with MOBILIX mobile phone service: Les Éditions Albert René Sàrl v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market, Orange A/S (Class 46) (IPKat) Global Global – General Moral… [read post]
12 Aug 2008, 2:00 pm
Loss Mitigation Services, Inc. [read post]
12 May 2010, 8:24 am
Lemley, William H. [read post]
