Search for: "Williams v. Campbell" Results 1 - 20 of 358
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Jan 2024, 8:09 am by Kurt Lash
Akhil Reed Amar (Yale) and Vikram David Amar (Illinois) in Trump v. [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 12:05 pm by Eugene Volokh
Jud Campbell, Natural Rights and the First Amendment, 127 Yale L.J. 246 (2017). [read post]
15 Nov 2023, 6:30 am by ernst
William Baude, University of Chicago Law School, Jud Campbell, Stanford Law School, and Stephen E. [read post]
23 Oct 2023, 9:30 pm by ernst
. 'The normal meaning of securities is not open to doubt'; Viscount Cave in Singer v Williams (1920). [read post]
6 Sep 2023, 9:43 am by An Pham
On August 1, 2023, the Federal Court of Appeal released its decision in Secure v Commissioner of Competition,[1] upholding the Competition Tribunal’s order requiring Secure Energy Inc. to divest 29 facilities to remedy the anti-competitive effects in 136 markets in western Canada arising from its July 2021 acquisition of Tervita Corporation.[2] It provides important guidance on the standard to be met to establish an efficiencies defense under the Competition Act. [read post]
3 Aug 2023, 1:03 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
So he doesn’t think this undoes the progress of Campbell and Google v. [read post]
13 Jul 2023, 5:51 pm by Orin S. Kerr
All of this is a wind-up to say that, last week, the Maryland Supreme Court ruled on both questions in considerable detail in an important new case, State v. [read post]
29 May 2023, 9:03 am by INFORRM
  Evidence was given by, among others (for the defendant), former Mirror Group CEO Sly Bailey, former Mirror Group Chairman David Grigson,  former group legal director Paul Vickers, former in house lawyer Marcus Partington and (for the claimant) former No.10 communications director Alastair Campbell and actor Les Dennis. [read post]
23 May 2023, 12:58 am by INFORRM
” IPSO Resolution Statement – 14832-23 Hyman v Sunday Mirror, 1 Accuracy (2021), 2 Privacy (2021), 4 Intrusion into grief or shock (2021), Resolved – IPSO mediation Statements in open court and apologies On 16 May 2023, a statement in open court was read in resolution of the defamation case Campbell v MGN Limited QB-2020-003829. [read post]
15 May 2023, 1:53 am by INFORRM
Johnson J reached the same decision as Heather Williams J ([2023] EWHC 232 (KB) [pdf]). [read post]
28 Feb 2023, 3:51 pm by Amy Howe
(William Hennessy) Kagan interpreted the HEROES Act very differently. [read post]
23 Feb 2023, 12:42 pm by Norman L. Eisen
On Thursday, the DC Circuit Court of Appeals held a hearing on whether Rep. [read post]
22 Nov 2022, 6:00 am by Beth Graham
In Section V, we briefly conclude and point to several areas in which additional research would be particularly useful. [read post]
12 Oct 2022, 4:32 pm by Mark Walsh
And then it is on to the argument in Andy Warhol Foundation for the Visual Arts Inc. v. [read post]
11 Oct 2022, 6:58 am by Dennis Crouch
Warhol’s key legal precedent on point is Campbell v. [read post]