Search for: "Williams v. Campbell" Results 121 - 140 of 357
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Oct 2015, 5:00 am by Terry Hart
” To explain the distinction, Leval turned to the same passage from the Supreme Court’s opinion in Campbell v. [read post]
5 Aug 2015, 6:28 am
Campbell, 359 N.C. 644, 617 S.E.2d 1 (North Carolina Supreme Court 2005) (quoting Floridav. [read post]
13 Jul 2015, 3:05 am
[Follow him on Twitter: @BillMcGev.]Abstract: In the two decades since the Supreme Court protected a crude rap spoof from copyright liability in Campbell v. [read post]
27 May 2015, 7:42 am by Rebecca Tushnet
 Charlesworth: Campbell remanded on quantity. [read post]
21 May 2015, 10:19 am by John Elwood
Campbell-Ewald Co. v. [read post]
11 May 2015, 3:55 am by INFORRM
In Bright Lord Judge CJ cited from Lord Camden CJ’s judgment in Entick v Carrington  and from William Pitt, Earl of Chatham. [read post]
17 Apr 2015, 2:45 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
 Mark McKenna, presenting for William McGeveran, Minnesota: How do courts treat parody in TM? [read post]
24 Mar 2015, 2:38 pm by Daily Record Staff
William Campbell, appellant, was convicted in the Circuit Court for Baltimore County of first and second degree rape, kidnapping, armed robbery, robbery, false imprisonment and theft under $1,000. [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 12:00 pm by Andy Wang
Prosecutor William Weinreb started his examination slowly, gradually tesasing out the mechanics and magnitude of the Boston Marathon. [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 8:00 am by Jodie Liu
Lead prosecutor William Weinreb took the podium, painting a vivid scene of the 2013 Boston Marathon. [read post]
23 Feb 2015, 4:06 am by Terry Hart
’” 6Alan Latman, Fair Use of Copyrighted Works, pg 7, Copyright Law Revision Study No. 14, US Copyright Office (1958); accord Campbell v. [read post]
9 Feb 2015, 9:58 am by Rebecca Tushnet
 William McGeveran, What Campbell Can (and Can’t) Teach Trademark Law Campbell is important for various things, including ill-advised parody/satire distinction. [read post]