Search for: "Williams v. City of Oakland" Results 1 - 20 of 51
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
City of Oakland (2023) 92 Cal.App.5th 799, the First District Court of Appeal held an agreement between a developer and the City of Oakland was unenforceable to the extent it prevented the city from imposing new impact fees in the future. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 4:07 am by Seth Jaffe
On Monday, Judge William Alsup dismissed the public nuisance case brought by the City of Oakland and the State of California against five major oil companies. [read post]
2 Mar 2018, 7:54 am by Seth Jaffe
Earlier this week, Judge William Alsup denied a motion by Oakland and San Francisco to remand their public nuisance claims against some of the world’s largest fossil fuel producers to state court. [read post]
19 May 2021, 12:34 pm by Nathan Sheard
So Oakland’s CCOPS law tasked the PAC with providing advice to the city council on surveillance proposals.While Oakland’s PAC is made up exclusively of volunteer community members with a demonstrated interest in privacy rights, San Francisco took a different approach. [read post]
13 Sep 2019, 1:19 pm by Jason Kelley
Second, there’s Oakland Privacy, who represent what a supporting, inspiring, grassroots community can accomplish – putting the city of Oakland far ahead of the national conversation on these issues. [read post]
15 Oct 2014, 7:02 am
Living for the City: Migration, Education, and the Rise of the Black Panther Party in Oakland, California. [read post]
16 Jan 2012, 6:56 am by Jay McDaniel
House, Paul Hastings LLP, San Francisco, CA; Jennifer Wysong Gloss, Oracle USA, Inc., Redwood City, CA; Steven Christopher Holtzman, William Fred Norton, Jr., Boies, Schiller & Flexner LLP, Oakland, CA. [read post]