Search for: "Williams v. Fears" Results 101 - 120 of 1,095
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Nov 2022, 9:04 pm by Jeffrey Lubbers
Justice Robert Jackson famously described the Act four years later in the case of Wang Yang Sung v. [read post]
30 Oct 2022, 9:00 pm by Austin Sarat
Austin Sarat is the William Nelson Cromwell Professor of Jurisprudence and Political Science at Amherst College. [read post]
26 Oct 2022, 6:38 am by Jennifer González
However, the precise definition of obscenity was unclear, and the Supreme Court would not rule that obscenity was not constitutionally protected speech until Roth v. [read post]
24 Oct 2022, 5:14 am by INFORRM
The purpose of section 137.1 is to reduce the risk that participation by the public in debates on matters of public interest will be hampered by fear of legal action [56]. [read post]
12 Oct 2022, 4:32 pm by Mark Walsh
And then it is on to the argument in Andy Warhol Foundation for the Visual Arts Inc. v. [read post]
3 Oct 2022, 12:12 pm by INFORRM
The issue of costs ordered in the defamation element of Piepenbrock v London School of Economics and Political Science & Ors [2022] EWHC 2421 (KB) was resolved in a judgment handed down on 30 September 2022 by Heather Williams J. [read post]
23 Sep 2022, 5:01 am by Jonathan Shaub
The second period represents a time of flux for privilege as the executive branch wrestles with the fallout from Watergate and attempts to interpret and apply United States v. [read post]
13 Sep 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  Given that I am not writing a series of full-scale articles, I fear that I cannot do justice to all of the essays (or, perhaps, to any of them), but I will try my best to focus on some of the most important themes. [read post]
8 Sep 2022, 5:35 am by Jack Goldsmith
Say, for instance, that Fox, as part of its sports coverage, decides to sell video games involving the names, likenesses, and statistics of Babe Ruth, Ted Williams, Jackie Robinson, and the like. [read post]
6 Sep 2022, 8:13 am by Eugene Volokh
K.D. v D.D., officially released today by the Appellate Court of Connecticut, in an opinion by Judge Douglas Lavine, joined by Chief Judge William Bright and then-Judge Joan Alexander, involved a restraining order obtained by a divorcing wife against her husband: [The plaintiff wife] testified that on the evening of June 24, 2021, she went to a restaurant with a group of others, including friends of the defendant. [read post]
4 Sep 2022, 4:15 pm by INFORRM
On 1 August 2022, judgment was handed down in Wright v McCormack [2022] EWHC 2068 (QB) by Chamberlain J. [read post]
19 Aug 2022, 6:34 am by Doyle Hodges
While not directly comparable, this is similar to the position affirmed by the Court in Gillette v. [read post]