Search for: "Williams v. Gaye"
Results 1 - 20
of 39
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Mar 2015, 5:07 am
Pharrell Williams’ and Robin Thicke’s 2013 hit Blurred Lines was in fact only 50% their hit, according to a jury verdict in mid-March that found in favor of Marvin Gaye’s children. [read post]
21 Mar 2018, 10:42 am
See Williams v. [read post]
7 Sep 2016, 10:00 pm
"Got To Give It Up‚¬ The Court refused to allow the jury to compare the Marvin Gaye version of "Got to Give it Up,"with the Williams/Thicke version of"Blurred Lines‚¬. [read post]
21 Mar 2018, 10:32 am
Today's 9th Circuit opinion in Williams v. [read post]
22 Mar 2018, 4:44 am
Second, even had the Gayes preserved their challenge, neither Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 50(b) nor our decisions in Westinghouse and El-Hakem v. [read post]
13 Feb 2015, 4:36 am
As readers may recall [see hereand here], the litigation arose after Pharrell Williams, Robin Thicke and Clifford Harris, Jr., pre-emptively sought declaratory relief that Blurred Lines did not infringe copyright in Gaye’s Got To Give It Up, following accusations by the Gaye family of unlawful similarities between the two works. [read post]
17 Mar 2017, 3:57 am
Bright: The Changing Analysis of Copyright Infringement in Music, bringing together some of the nation’s brightest artists, lawyers, policymakers and academics to discuss the rapidly changing analysis of copyright infringement in music.The "Blurred Lines" case, in which Marvin Gaye’s estate secured a multi-million dollar judgment against songwriters and recording artists Pharrell Williams and Robin Thicke for copyright infringement stemming from… [read post]
27 Mar 2015, 4:43 pm
Thicke Just days before SXSW, a court awarded $7.3 million to the family of Marvin Gaye as the result of the contentious and highly publicized Gaye v. [read post]
12 Apr 2018, 7:01 am
Williams v. [read post]
16 Mar 2015, 5:00 am
Fast-forward to a relatively huge copyright jury verdict in the Williams v. [read post]
2 May 2015, 1:47 am
The Appeals Court decision in Blurred Lines is keenly awaited by many.More on Billboard here , Williams v Bridgeport Music, Inc, No. 13-06004 (C.D. [read post]
1 Feb 2019, 1:30 am
It builds up tension (I-IV-V) and then Resolves it (V-I). [read post]
12 Mar 2015, 5:46 am
I went back 99 years to Haas v. [read post]
9 Jan 2019, 2:54 pm
The case is very similar to another that the Gaye family bought against Robin Thicke and Pharrell Williams, where they succeeded in claiming "Blurred Lines" copied "Got To Give It Up". [read post]
4 Jan 2019, 9:37 am
The case is very similar to another that the Gaye family bought against Robin Thicke and Pharrell Williams, where they succeeded in claiming "Blurred Lines" copied "Got To Give It Up". [read post]
6 Mar 2015, 11:41 am
Swirsky v. [read post]
29 Mar 2017, 3:30 am
The most visible perhaps is the recent case of Williams v. [read post]
7 Jan 2019, 8:30 am
The Gaye estate previously won a similar case against Robin Thicke and Pharrell Williams over the song Blurred Lines, which they claimed was an infringement of the Gaye song Got To Give it Up. 3: Justice Alito ‘Unrecuses’ for 9th Time, Rejoining Oracle Copyright Case Finally today, Tony Mauro at the National Law Journal reports that U.S. [read post]
18 Mar 2015, 4:01 am
”And with Marvin Gaye's children now musing what other songs may have been 'copied' from their father's work (the last I heard, it was Pharrell Williams in the firing line again for his smash hit 'Happy', which Nona Gaye says is a copy of Hayes 1966 song 'Ain’t That Peculiar') an appeal in the Blurred Lines case has been formally announced. [read post]
5 Jun 2015, 3:15 am
More here.and more here.Universal has submitted papers to the US Courts arguing that despite Pharrell Williams and Robin Thicke being found liable by a jury for plagiarising Marvin Gaye's "Got to Give It Up" - rapper TI (real name Clifford Harris) and their Interscope label cannot be held liable in the "Blurred Lines" litigation - because the said jury didn't find against them: "The court may not enter an order declaring that… [read post]
