Search for: "Williams v. Johnson" Results 1 - 20 of 1,186
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Apr 2024, 10:08 am by admin
The limits of peer review ultimately make it a poor proxy for the validity tests posed by Rules 702 and 703. [read post]
7 Apr 2024, 9:05 pm by renholding
For many business economists and legal academics, the purpose of any business organization is simply stated: to maximize profits. [read post]
3 Mar 2024, 12:24 pm by Josh Blackman
[Professor Shugerman's argument that the 1793 Hamilton Document, that is, a list of "every person holding any civil office or employment under the United States, (except the judges)," was intended to ensure compliance with the Constitution's Sinecure Clause lacks support.] [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
It is profoundly gratifying to have the “mechanics of craft” by which these volumes sought to extract a convincing narrative from “inherently overlapping and inextricably intertwined thematic doctrinal material” recognized and appreciated by so exceptional an historian as William Novak. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 9:52 am by Marty Lederman
In one of my previous posts, I explained why it's unlikely that a majority of the Justices will hold that the Fourteenth Amendment bars Donald Trump from holding federal office. [read post]
12 Jan 2024, 12:23 pm by Amy Howe
The court granted review in two other cases on Friday: Williams v. [read post]
10 Jan 2024, 1:27 am by Joshua Matz
Michaels Professor of Law UCLA School of Law Timothy Naftali Senior Research Scholar Columbia University School of International and Public Affairs Victoria Nourse Ralph V. [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 9:01 pm by Josh Blackman
Here the article invoked the same reasoning used by Chief Justice Marshall in United States v. [read post]
8 Jan 2024, 2:02 am by INFORRM
On the same day there was a consequentials hearing in the case of LCG v OVD, QB-2022-000921. [read post]
28 Dec 2023, 4:25 pm by INFORRM
There were seven judgments handed down after full trials, only one of which concerned a claim against a mainstream media organisation: Dyson v MGN; Miller v Turner; Crobsie v Ley; Aaronson v Stones; LCG v OVD; Bekoe v Islington; Packham v Wightman and  Hay v Cresswell. [read post]