Search for: "Williams v. King"
Results 1 - 20
of 907
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Mar 2024, 9:37 am
RageOn * CreateSpace Isn’t Liable for Publishing Allegedly Infringing Uploaded Book–King v. [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 1:11 am
Review of the ecclesiastical court judgments during February 2024 Nine consistory court judgments were circulated in 2024 including: Procedure Churchyards and burials Reordering, extensions and other building works Exhumation Churchyards and burials Also included are: Privy Council Business; Other legal issues; Visitations; CFCE Determinations; and Links to other posts relating to ecclesiastical law. [read post]
5 Mar 2024, 8:59 am
RageOn * CreateSpace Isn’t Liable for Publishing Allegedly Infringing Uploaded Book–King v. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 9:00 am
This history is analyzed in greater depth in , Soldiers on the Home Front: The Domestic Role of the American Military (2016) by William C. [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 8:57 am
Much of the evidence I discuss here has been ignored or overlooked in the existing scholarship on Section Three, and most of it does not appear in any of the briefs in Trump v. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 9:52 am
The short version is that it’s a stone-cold loser, not least because it would have absurd ramifications (such as that it would mean Jefferson Davis would’ve been disqualified from serving in virtually any federal or state office except the presidency and vice-presidency, and that the Foreign Emoluments Clause wouldn’t prohibit the President, Vice-President, and members of Congress from accepting titles, offices, gifts or emoluments from foreign states,… [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 9:27 am
RageOn * CreateSpace Isn’t Liable for Publishing Allegedly Infringing Uploaded Book–King v. [read post]
21 Jan 2024, 9:01 pm
If the battle to root out racial prejudice in capital cases is ever to be won, it will require that we not turn a blind eye to cases like Warren King’s.That case also offers the Court a chance to send a clear message about the seriousness with which it takes violations of its 1986 Batson v. [read post]
17 Jan 2024, 5:18 am
In the case of Hendrix v. [read post]
10 Jan 2024, 9:01 pm
”Follow @ljstprof Austin Sarat is the William Nelson Cromwell Professor of Jurisprudence and Political Science at Amherst College. [read post]
10 Jan 2024, 1:27 am
Chair of Law Martin Luther King Jr. [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 5:46 am
Selembo v. [read post]
28 Dec 2023, 4:25 pm
There is no comprehensive public record of judgments handed down in the Kings Bench Division, Media and Communications List (“MAC List”) in 2023. [read post]
20 Dec 2023, 5:21 am
(Cohen, v. 2, p. 9.) [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 11:20 pm
In Democratic Republic of the Congo v. [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 4:54 am
Dan Williams reports for Reuters. [read post]
11 Dec 2023, 9:05 pm
Striving to better, oft we mar what’s well — William Shakespeare, King Lear (1606) The Delaware Court of Chancery has, for more than a century, honed unparalleled expertise in a unique body of corporate law based on equity – and is thus adaptable enough to address injustice. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 3:06 pm
Oh Mickey, you’re so fine—but you’re not alone: An avalanche of copyrighted works will enter the public domain in the United States on January 1, 2024. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 7:41 am
The case of King v Victor Parsons & Co [1973] 1 WLR 29 examined the situation where a person acted recklessly “like the man who turns a blind eye” determining that a person who “refrained from further inquiry lest awareness of a risk should prove to be correct, was said to be in the same position as a person who acted knowingly”. [read post]
12 Nov 2023, 6:17 am
Ignatius Yordan Nugraha, Strasbourg Observers: Consolidating the legal recognition and protection of same-sex couples: Koilova and Babulkova v Bulgaria. [read post]
