Search for: "Williams v. San Francisco"
Results 241 - 260
of 541
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Apr 2013, 2:38 pm
Court of Appeals in San Francisco has ruled (In re: Western States Wholesale Natural Gas Antitrust Litigation, April 10, 2013, Bea, C.). [read post]
6 Oct 2018, 9:47 am
In a ruling on a lawsuit filed by the city of San Francisco and the state of California, Judge Orrick's opinion concludes that all three of these conditions are unconstitutional because only Congress, not the executive, has the power to impose conditions on federal grants to state governments. [read post]
23 Jan 2023, 4:00 am
Krauss, New Light on the History of Free Exercise Exemptions: The Debates in Two Eighteenth-Century State Legislatures, (Catholic University Law Review, Vol. 71, No. 4, 2022).Luke Boso, Religious Liberty, Discriminatory Intent, and the Status Quo Constitution, (Univ. of San Francisco Law Research Paper , Jan. 2023).Enrico Bonadio, Krishna Ravi Srinivas, Balaji Parthasarathy Iyengar & Atreya Choudhary, Gandhian Philosophy and Indian Intellectual Property,… [read post]
10 Dec 2018, 11:02 am
” For the full complaint in Center for Genetics and Society v. [read post]
12 Feb 2017, 1:12 pm
For a thoughtful analysis of the tough questions that await WHO, see Vik Amar and Michael Schaps, How Strong is San Francisco’s ‘Sanctuary City’ Lawsuit Against the Trump Administration, available here. [read post]
21 Nov 2019, 6:03 am
of Texas at Austin 1.18 $106,598 $90,100 V&erbilt Univ. 1.19 $129,030 $108,800 Univ. of Arkansas 1.19 $61,500 $51,700 Mitchell Hamline Sch. of Law 1.21 $64,429 $53,200 Univ. of California-Los Angeles 1.26 $121,453 $96,600 Univ. of North Dakota 1.26 $61,500 $48,800 Univ. of Kansas 1.27 $66,415 $52,100 Univ. of Kentucky 1.28 $69,860 $54,400 Univ. of Mississippi 1.32 $64,300 $48,700 The Univ. [read post]
20 Jan 2014, 1:21 pm
Laurence of San Francisco, a supervising state deputy attorney general, for the state, and Rachel P. [read post]
24 Apr 2008, 7:13 am
The 9th Circuit, based in San Francisco, endorsed this argument in a case involving Poway School District that has generated extensive media comment. [read post]
19 Aug 2008, 7:42 pm
[Murphy v. [read post]
17 Feb 2021, 9:10 am
Fifteen municipalities across the country have banned government use of face recognition technology, including Boston, Massachusetts, San Francisco, California and Jackson, Mississippi. [read post]
10 Apr 2013, 12:00 pm
The Annual Meeting of the Organization of American Historians starts tomorrow in San Francisco. [read post]
5 Jun 2008, 6:20 am
Meachum v. [read post]
12 Dec 2023, 4:00 am
City and County of San Francisco (2023) 90 Cal.App.5th 643, San Francisco’s typical arduous land use approval process sets the foundation for an anti-SLAAP case with interesting ramifications for neighborly disputes. [read post]
4 Apr 2017, 12:10 pm
City of San Francisco that if an employee is “a policymaker, then . . . his government employment could be terminated for purely political reasons without offending the First Amendment. [read post]
22 Nov 2021, 3:10 pm
City of San Francisco that if an employee is “a policymaker, then . . . his government employment could be terminated for purely political reasons without offending the First Amendment. [read post]
24 Jan 2010, 12:44 pm
United States v. [read post]
23 May 2008, 1:00 pm
This recalls to mind the scolding that Justice William Brennan gave to counsel for Price Waterhouse in the Supreme Court case of Price Waterhouse v. [read post]
23 Apr 2019, 9:23 pm
After the public comment period and the San Francisco Board of Supervisors (“the City”) certified the FEIR, plaintiffs sought a writ of mandate in San Francisco Superior Court including alleged violations of CEQA requesting that the trial court set aside the certification of the FEIR and approval of the project. [read post]
1 Mar 2008, 2:48 am
Photo of Dennis Riordan by Lacy Atkins, San Francisco Chronicle.Steven Kalar, Senior Litigator N.D. [read post]
8 Jan 2013, 9:04 am
City and County of San Francisco (2012) 208 Cal.App.4th 950: The lead agency correctly applied a Class 3 CEQA exemption to applications for permits to add wireless equipment throughout the City and County of San Francisco. [read post]
