Search for: "Williams v. State of California (1983)"
Results 81 - 100
of 169
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Oct 2008, 3:49 pm
Pruitt, No. 06-6002 Given the particular characteristics of North Carolina sentencing law, in light of recent United States Supreme Court precedent, in determining whether to apply the career offender provision of the United States Sentencing Guidelines, a federal court must take into account the defendant's state criminal history (or lack thereof) at the time of his predicate North Carolina convictions. [read post]
14 Oct 2022, 6:03 am
“Plaintiffs rely heavily on the plurality opinion of Justice [William] Brennan in Board of Education, Island Trees Union Free School District No. 26 v. [read post]
10 Sep 2014, 9:00 am
Williams v. [read post]
5 Aug 2013, 10:25 am
Rptr. 342 (1983); Eastwood v. [read post]
30 Mar 2022, 10:23 am
(relisted after the March 18 and March 25 conferences) Williams v. [read post]
21 Apr 2008, 11:52 am
" Consequently, a state drug offense punishable by more than one year qualifies as a "felony drug offense," even if state law classifies the offense as a misdemeanor. [read post]
22 Dec 2008, 10:30 pm
Issue: Whether under United States v. [read post]
10 Aug 2020, 9:15 am
• Lester V. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 11:55 am
However, Conte was decided by but one of several California appellate courts, and we understand that they don’t have to follow each other’s decisions. [read post]
27 May 2008, 9:50 am
Williams, No. 06-694 A statute criminalizing, in certain specified circumstances, the pandering or solicitation of child pornography is neither overbroad under the First Amendment nor impermissibly vague under the Due Process Clause. [read post]
9 Jun 2020, 9:01 pm
§ 1983, authorizes victims of civil rights violations by state and local officials to sue for damages. [read post]
28 Aug 2015, 9:36 am
” State v. [read post]
29 Apr 2008, 7:13 am
City of New York , No. 06-1983 Read more... [read post]
15 Apr 2011, 6:02 am
California has a number of consumer protection statutes. [read post]
6 May 2010, 2:30 pm
(Professor William D. [read post]
13 Feb 2013, 9:01 pm
Perry, the plaintiffs challenge California’s voter-adopted ban on same-sex marriage (Proposition 8), and in the other, United States v. [read post]
1 Jun 2021, 7:42 am
Six years later, William Prosser, Dean of the University of California at Berkeley School of Law and author of the treatise Prosser on Torts, authored an influential ar [read post]
24 Sep 2010, 3:08 pm
§ 1681t, preempts a California statute that creates a private damages remedy for violations of state law with respect to the obligations of furnishers of information to CRAs.Certiorari-Stage Documents:Opinion below (9th Circuit)Petition for certiorariBrief in oppositionPetitioner's replyAmicus brief for the American Bankers Association et al.Amicus brief for the California Apartment AssociationAmicus brief for the Consumer Data Industry Association Title: Wilson… [read post]
5 Dec 2007, 4:52 pm
State of California (1998) 63 Cal.App.4th 1108; see People v. [read post]
13 Feb 2023, 9:59 am
Carpenters, 459 U.S. 519 (1983). 2136. [read post]
