Search for: "Williams v. Superior Court" Results 361 - 380 of 1,005
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Mar 2016, 2:14 pm by Brian E. Barreira
The reason for this Suffolk Superior Court appeal is that (d) in this regulation was misinterpreted by the Hearing Officer after it was recklessly misrepresented by the Office of Medicaid. [read post]
15 Mar 2016, 2:14 pm by Brian E. Barreira
The reason for this Suffolk Superior Court appeal is that (d) in this regulation was misinterpreted by the Hearing Officer after it was recklessly misrepresented by the Office of Medicaid. [read post]
23 Feb 2016, 8:29 pm by Edward A. Fallone
Madison, Justice Joseph Story in his Commentaries on the Constitution of the United States, and the modern Supreme Court in Edmond v. [read post]
22 Feb 2016, 10:32 am
In 2010, he received the Director's Award from United States Attorney General Eric Holder for superior performance for his work in the prosecution of United States v. [read post]
17 Feb 2016, 9:01 pm by Marci A. Hamilton
There had been a push since the 1960s when Justice William Brennan for a majority inserted strict scrutiny into a free exercise case, Sherbert v. [read post]
15 Jan 2016, 1:41 pm
This post examines an opinion from the Superior Court of Pennsylvania:  Commonwealth v. [read post]
11 Jan 2016, 7:00 am by Venkat Balasubramani
Nordstrom California Supreme Court: Retail Privacy Statute Doesn’t Apply to Download Transactions – Apple v Superior Court (Krescent) CA Court Confirms that Pineda v Williams-Sonoma (the Zip-Code-as-PII Case) Applies Retrospectively — Dardarian v. [read post]
7 Jan 2016, 1:51 pm by Venkat Balasubramani
Nordstrom California Supreme Court: Retail Privacy Statute Doesn’t Apply to Download Transactions – Apple v Superior Court (Krescent) CA Court Confirms that Pineda v Williams-Sonoma (the Zip-Code-as-PII Case) Applies Retrospectively — Dardarian v. [read post]
5 Jan 2016, 6:26 am by John Rubin
In felony cases tried in superior court, in which an indictment is necessary to give the superior court jurisdiction, the answer is not as clear. [read post]
5 Jan 2016, 6:26 am by John Rubin
In felony cases tried in superior court, in which an indictment is necessary to give the superior court jurisdiction, the answer is not as clear. [read post]
27 Dec 2015, 12:02 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
William Osburn; 2007 Mealey’s CA Jury Verdicts & Settlements 296 Lucasfilm Ltd. v. [read post]