Search for: "Williamson v. State" Results 201 - 220 of 974
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Sep 2019, 1:40 pm by Ilya Somin
The big issue at stake in Knick was whether the Court should overrule Williamson County Regional Planning Commission v. [read post]
29 Aug 2019, 2:39 pm by Peter Margulies
Receiving asylum is difficult, in part because of the requirement noted by the Supreme Court in INS v. [read post]
9 Aug 2019, 5:35 am by Jackie McDermott
In the United States, to implement such a system via constitutional amendment, the process laid out by Article V requires that two-thirds of both houses of Congress propose the amendment, or that the amendment arises from a convention called for by two-thirds of state legislatures. [read post]
23 Jul 2019, 10:31 am by Yvette Mabbun and Kelly Vazhappilly
First, the majority stated that the Williamson County holding was not consistent with precedent or workable for litigants, as illuminated by San Remo Hotel, L.P. v. [read post]
22 Jul 2019, 5:00 pm by Patricia Salkin
 Knick overruled the 34-year-old precedent in Williamson County requiring that federal takings claimants seek compensation in state court before being allowed to proceed in federal court. [read post]