Search for: "Williamson v. State"
Results 341 - 360
of 847
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Nov 2015, 2:23 pm
Williamson, who is Of Counsel at Sullivan & Cromwell LLP. [read post]
15 Nov 2015, 2:50 pm
Williamson v. [read post]
2 Nov 2015, 11:45 am
Supreme Court dealt with those issues in McNeely v. [read post]
2 Nov 2015, 11:18 am
The court of appeals in State v. [read post]
2 Nov 2015, 11:18 am
The court of appeals in State v. [read post]
11 Sep 2015, 1:43 pm
Cir. 2015) Download opinionPanel: O’Malley (author), Plager and Taranto Earlier this summer, the Federal Circuit issued a revised opinion in Williamson v. [read post]
9 Sep 2015, 2:28 pm
United States v. [read post]
11 Aug 2015, 11:16 am
See FDA v. [read post]
22 Jul 2015, 1:55 pm
Montgomery v. [read post]
1 Jul 2015, 7:34 am
United States[13], the district court refused to enforce plaintiff’s Rule 45 subpoena that sought documents from defendant’s expert witness. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 8:27 pm
Last year, in Loving v. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 7:39 am
Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., 529 U. [read post]
16 Jun 2015, 7:42 am
Williamson v. [read post]
16 Jun 2015, 6:00 am
Carhart (the case upholding a federal ban on partial birth abortion), the analysis has proceeded by first asking whether there is a rational basis for the state’s action (under the loose, hands-off posture of Williamson v Lee Optical there almost always is), and if so, whether pursuing that goal imposes an undue burden on women’s access to abortion. [read post]
10 Jun 2015, 11:30 am
The Appellate Division affirmed the Supreme Court’s ruling, explaining that “Under FOIL, agency records are presumptively available for public inspection, without regard to the need or purpose of the applicant, unless the requested documents fall within one of the exemptions set forth in Public Officers Law §87(2)," citing Williamson v Fischer, 116 AD3d 1169, leave to appeal denied, 24 NY3d 904.The court said that "[e]xemptions are narrowly construed,… [read post]
10 Jun 2015, 11:30 am
The Appellate Division affirmed the Supreme Court’s ruling, explaining that “Under FOIL, agency records are presumptively available for public inspection, without regard to the need or purpose of the applicant, unless the requested documents fall within one of the exemptions set forth in Public Officers Law §87(2)," citing Williamson v Fischer, 116 AD3d 1169, leave to appeal denied, 24 NY3d 904.The court said that "[e]xemptions are narrowly construed,… [read post]
18 May 2015, 2:18 pm
Or as another court decision, Williamson v. [read post]
14 May 2015, 2:36 pm
In fact, under the Supreme Court’s 1985 decision in Hamilton Bank v. [read post]
30 Apr 2015, 8:00 am
Williamson and Dr. [read post]
18 Mar 2015, 4:30 am
Two years later, Mother married an officer in the United States Navy. [read post]
