Search for: "Williamson v. State" Results 501 - 520 of 829
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Nov 2011, 7:56 am by Steve Hall
  The responsibility of the state to provide exculpatory evidence to the defense was articulated in the 1963 Supreme Court ruling in Brady v. [read post]
28 Oct 2011, 7:38 pm by Kiera Flynn
Rhode Island  Docket: 11-231 Issue: Does the ripeness doctrine of Williamson County Reg’l Planning Comm’n v. [read post]
14 Oct 2011, 9:13 am by WSLL
Williamson, Assistant Attorney General. [read post]
14 Oct 2011, 8:33 am by Kiera Flynn
_________________________________________________  United States v. [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 8:25 am by Robert Thomas (inversecondemnation.com)
  The cert petition is asking the Supreme Court to revist and discard the ripeness rules of Williamson County Regional Planning Comm'n v. [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 8:13 am by Steve Hall
The landmark 1963 United States Supreme Court decision Brady v. [read post]
30 Sep 2011, 12:01 am by Robert Thomas (inversecondemnation.com)
The cert petition is asking the Suprme Court to revist and discard the ripeness rules of Williamson County Regional Planning Comm'n v. [read post]
24 Sep 2011, 6:13 am by Christa Culver
California Coastal Commission, which by definition implicate no compensation issues, fall outside the purview of the state-procedures rule outlined in Williamson County Regional Planning Commission v. [read post]
21 Sep 2011, 4:28 am
  The Appellate Division, after noting that it is “well-settled law that an arbitration award will be vacated only where ‘it is violative of a strong public policy, or is totally irrational, or exceeds a specifically enumerated limitation on [the arbitrator's] power,’ citing Matter of Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp. v Chesley, 7 AD3d 368, decided that in this instance the Department’s arguments met this test. [read post]
The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals upheld the district court’s dismissal of the claim, holding that Petitioner is required to seek a remedy for the taking through the California state courts, rather than the federal courts, pursuant to Williamson County Regional Planning Commission v. [read post]
29 Aug 2011, 3:55 pm by WOLFGANG DEMINO
Aug. 26, 2011)(per curiam opinion)(grant of more relief than requested, finality and partial summary judgment, harmful error analysis,  exception to rule that ground must be stated in the summary judgment motion)G & H TOWING COMPANY, ET AL. v. [read post]
25 Aug 2011, 3:21 pm by Robert Thomas (inversecondemnation.com)
The petition poses these Questions Presented: Does the ripeness doctrine of Williamson County Reg’l Planning Comm’n v. [read post]