Search for: "Williamson v. State"
Results 41 - 60
of 830
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Oct 2023, 5:01 am
Schwartzman, Inc. v Pliskin, Rubano, Baum, & Vitulli, 215 A.D.3d 699 [2d Dept. 2023]; Park/ex Associates v Flemming Zulack Williamson Zauderer, LLP, 118 A.D.3d 698 [2d Dept.2014 ]). [read post]
12 Oct 2023, 12:48 pm
The state reported 7,454 accidents and 215 fatalities. [read post]
11 Oct 2023, 5:09 pm
[Moore v. [read post]
4 Oct 2023, 6:30 am
A notable example of this is Indian courts’ affirmation of the proportionality standard, even though the actual test deployed is often, in practice, a weaker and more deferential form of review, including variations on the British concept of Wednesbury unreasonableness (a deferential form of review similar to the American approach in Williamson v. [read post]
4 Oct 2023, 2:59 am
In the case of Poplawski v. [read post]
2 Oct 2023, 1:51 am
Former cabinet minister Sir Gavin Williamson has been ordered to apologise after an inquiry found he had bullied a colleague in texts. [read post]
29 Sep 2023, 12:43 pm
Township of Scott (2019), the the Supreme Court reversed Williamson County Regional Planning Commission v. [read post]
11 Sep 2023, 3:00 pm
” In West Virginia v. [read post]
19 Jul 2023, 1:29 pm
II,§ 2, cl. 2)); United States v. [read post]
13 Jul 2023, 2:47 am
As the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida explained in Furmanite Am., Inc. v. [read post]
6 Jul 2023, 9:05 pm
Supreme Court, in a 6-3 decision in Biden v. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 6:56 am
Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., 529 U. [read post]
4 Jul 2023, 11:38 pm
Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., 529 U.S. 120, 133–35 (2000). [read post]
12 Jun 2023, 3:53 am
The continuous representation toll ends upon the conclusion of the matter or upon the attorney’s withdrawal from representation (see Shumsky, 96 NY2d at 170-171; Williamson ex rel. [read post]
17 May 2023, 4:10 am
In Tinker v. [read post]
10 May 2023, 6:16 pm
Ct. 2162 (2019), this Court reversed Williamson County Regional Planning Commission v. [read post]
9 May 2023, 6:51 am
A third trustee, Joseph Masella, agreed to settle charges that he caused and willfully counseled the fund’s violations (SEC v. [read post]
2 May 2023, 12:30 am
John the Evangelist Killingworth, supra, in which the Chancellor stated: “[53]. [read post]
24 Apr 2023, 7:00 am
In Brown v. [read post]
16 Apr 2023, 12:37 am
Revd Paul Williamson in court again In July 1997, the Revd Paul Williamson was made the subject of a Civil Proceedings Order as a vexatious litigant pursuant to s.42(1A) Senior Courts Act 1981 (Restriction of vexatious legal proceedings), primarily as a result of a series of proceedings arising from his opposition to the ordination of women: see R v HM Attorney-General ex parte Reverend Paul Stewart Williamson [1997] EWHC Admin 691. [read post]
