Search for: "Williamson v. United States" Results 21 - 40 of 401
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Aug 2008, 5:07 pm
  Defendants removed the State Court action to federal court, and plaintiffs then filed a maritime action in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, in which plaintiffs sought an attachment on the salvage from the S.S. [read post]
7 Dec 2015, 7:21 pm by The Federalist Society
 Under this exception, sovereign immunity does not bar a lawsuit “based on a commercial activity carried on in the United States by [a] foreign state. [read post]
8 Apr 2015, 11:34 am by Robert Thomas (inversecondemnation.com)
" Really: see slip op. at 8 ("We review the district court’s finding of bad-faith motivation for clear error, and so we would reverse only if the 'decision strikes us as wrong with the force of a five-week-old, unrefrigerated dead fish.'") (quoting United States v. [read post]
7 Oct 2009, 12:27 pm
Characterizing the Williamson County ripeness rules as creating a "sisyphean task" for property owners who seek to have federal takings claims litigated in federal court, the opinion walks through the myriad decisions from state administrative agencies, and state and federal courts which resulted.First, the federal suit was dismissed on Williamson County ripeness grounds because the property owner had not sought, and been denied, compensation in… [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 3:46 pm by Abbott & Kindermann
Township of Scott, Pennsylvania, ___ U.S. ___, 139 S.Ct. 2162, 204 L.Ed.2d 558 (2019) On June 21, 2019, by a 5-4 vote, the United States Supreme Court in Knick v. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 3:46 pm by Glen C. Hansen
Township of Scott, Pennsylvania, ___ U.S. ___, 139 S.Ct. 2162, 204 L.Ed.2d 558 (2019) On June 21, 2019, by a 5-4 vote, the United States Supreme Court in Knick v. [read post]
25 May 2010, 4:58 am by Bexis
Yesterday, the Supreme Court granted cert. in Williamson v.. [read post]
5 Jan 2011, 12:38 am by John Day
Oral arguments were heard two months ago in Williamson v. [read post]
2 Oct 2018, 10:02 am by Robert Thomas (inversecondemnation.com)
United States Supreme Court Hears Important Takings Case (my friend Ed Sullivan, dean of the Oregon Land Use Bar, writes up his thoughts at Law of the Land blog)  Knick v. [read post]
5 Mar 2011, 2:41 pm
The United States Supreme Court has ruled that a family is allowed to pursue its lawsuit in California against Mazda Motors of American, Inc. because it made its 1993 Mazda MPV minivan with only lap seatbelts in the middle of the seats of the second row in the vehicle. [read post]
5 Mar 2011, 2:41 pm
The United States Supreme Court has ruled that a family is allowed to pursue its lawsuit in California against Mazda Motors of American, Inc. because it made its 1993 Mazda MPV minivan with only lap seat belts in the middle of the seats of the second row in the vehicle. [read post]
1 May 2017, 10:00 am by Robert Thomas (inversecondemnation.com)
United States, 444 U.S. 164 (1979), this is the government telling the public "come on in, the water's fine"), this resulted in a lawsuit. [read post]