Search for: "Williamson v. United States"
Results 21 - 40
of 415
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Oct 2009, 12:27 pm
Characterizing the Williamson County ripeness rules as creating a "sisyphean task" for property owners who seek to have federal takings claims litigated in federal court, the opinion walks through the myriad decisions from state administrative agencies, and state and federal courts which resulted.First, the federal suit was dismissed on Williamson County ripeness grounds because the property owner had not sought, and been denied, compensation in… [read post]
21 May 2014, 6:54 am
United States v. [read post]
8 Jan 2010, 10:39 pm
United States v. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 3:46 pm
Township of Scott, Pennsylvania, ___ U.S. ___, 139 S.Ct. 2162, 204 L.Ed.2d 558 (2019) On June 21, 2019, by a 5-4 vote, the United States Supreme Court in Knick v. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 3:46 pm
Township of Scott, Pennsylvania, ___ U.S. ___, 139 S.Ct. 2162, 204 L.Ed.2d 558 (2019) On June 21, 2019, by a 5-4 vote, the United States Supreme Court in Knick v. [read post]
25 May 2010, 4:58 am
Yesterday, the Supreme Court granted cert. in Williamson v.. [read post]
25 Sep 2018, 6:35 pm
The case, Knick v. [read post]
5 Jan 2011, 12:38 am
Oral arguments were heard two months ago in Williamson v. [read post]
22 Jun 2019, 6:32 am
United States and First English Evangelical Lutheran Church v. [read post]
5 Mar 2011, 2:41 pm
The United States Supreme Court has ruled that a family is allowed to pursue its lawsuit in California against Mazda Motors of American, Inc. because it made its 1993 Mazda MPV minivan with only lap seatbelts in the middle of the seats of the second row in the vehicle. [read post]
22 Jun 2019, 3:15 am
For nearly 36 years, the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Williamson County Regional Planning Commission v. [read post]
6 Apr 2011, 12:39 pm
Williamson v. [read post]
5 Mar 2011, 2:41 pm
The United States Supreme Court has ruled that a family is allowed to pursue its lawsuit in California against Mazda Motors of American, Inc. because it made its 1993 Mazda MPV minivan with only lap seat belts in the middle of the seats of the second row in the vehicle. [read post]
9 Jan 2013, 6:23 am
Compare United States v. [read post]
16 Jan 2019, 12:05 pm
To briefly recap, the main point at issue in Knick is whether the Court should overrule or limit Williamson County Regional Planning Commission v. [read post]
10 Jul 2013, 8:10 am
United States, 487 F2d 1345, 1350 (Ct. [read post]
18 Mar 2015, 4:30 am
Two years later, Mother married an officer in the United States Navy. [read post]
17 Jan 2019, 11:28 am
Solicitor General Noel Francisco argued the case on behalf of the United States. [read post]
17 May 2012, 12:29 pm
Well, in Bowlby v. [read post]
