Search for: "Willis v. Rich" Results 1 - 20 of 30
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Jan 2011, 8:22 am by Sheldon Toplitt
Rowling's Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire brought by the estate of the author of The Adventures of Willy the Wizard--No 1 Livid Land, Courthouse News Service reports.In tossing the 13-page complaint in Paul Gregory Allen, Trustee of the Estate of Adrian Jacobs v. [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 9:05 am by Above the Law
It’s no wonder that “[v]irtually all of the associates want to work for Rich [Ruben],” a Jones Day litigation partner. [read post]
27 Nov 2011, 4:42 pm by Ray Dowd
(disclosure - the author represented the Grosz heirs in Grosz v. [read post]
17 Oct 2022, 7:56 am by Anna Bower
Fulton County district attorney Fani Willis is closing in on Donald Trump’s 2020 election meddling: CNN reports that Willis could begin issuing indictments as soon as December. [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
My hope was that the resulting narrative might be sufficiently rich that contemporary commentators could, as Jim Fleming put it in his careful contribution discussing the implications of the Taft Court’s substantive due process doctrine for the contemporary Roberts Court, harvest what has been “tee[d] up for” them. [read post]
4 Jul 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  The court-enforced Constitution fully displaces other institutional forms of constitutional argument such as legislative constitutional duty only in the mid-twentieth century, as the Court becomes identified with Brown v. [read post]
23 Jan 2023, 10:53 am by Anna Bower
Consistent with that rich history, there is a strong public interest in releasing the report as requested by the grand jurors. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 7:00 am by Guest Blogger
Bell as well as the anti-miscegenation statute at issue in Loving v. [read post]
16 Mar 2013, 4:58 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
”  The rich as well as the poor are free to sleep under bridges! [read post]
14 Dec 2015, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
For example, in 1847, showing a healthy suspicion for principles developed in the ecclesiastical courts and the Star Chamber, Australians came up with the defence of triviality, a defence drawn from Australia’s convict past, where nobody had much of a reputation – or, as Rich J more diplomatically put it, “to meet the hard conditions of pioneer days” (Lang v Willis (1934) 52 CLR 637 at 650). [read post]