Search for: "Wilson v. City Bank"
Results 21 - 40
of 158
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Dec 2017, 9:57 am
Francoeur, on the brief), Wilson Elser Moskowitz Edelman & Dicker LLP, New York, N.Y., for Midland Funding, LLC and Midland Credit Management, Inc.Before: LEVAL, STRAUB and DRONEY, Circuit Judges.STRAUB, Circuit Judge:This putative class action alleges violations of the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act ("FDCPA") and New York's usury law. [read post]
12 Dec 2017, 9:57 am
Angel Rzeslawsk,The National Bank Act and the Demise of State Consumer Laws, 68 Hastings L.J. 1421 (2017).CASE CITE: Madden v. [read post]
24 Oct 2019, 7:00 am
City of Chicago, Illinois v. [read post]
31 Oct 2017, 4:20 am
Bank National Association v. [read post]
17 Oct 2014, 4:52 pm
" City of Keller v. [read post]
19 May 2017, 12:23 pm
; Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 3:47 am
Birmingham City Council v Abdulla & Ors, heard 11 July 2012. [read post]
18 Feb 2010, 5:45 pm
City of Keller v. [read post]
18 Nov 2016, 3:03 am
The outcome, however, may well cause the City regulator to change its own culture of enforcement. [read post]
5 Jul 2016, 4:00 am
Wilson v. [read post]
27 Mar 2011, 11:48 am
While the comings and goings of an unrelated male can be one indicia of cohabitation, in the case of Okoshi-Wilson v. [read post]
4 May 2019, 12:39 pm
See Hay v. [read post]
7 Nov 2011, 9:39 am
JP Morgan Chase Bank N.A. and another v Berliner Verkehrsbetriebe (BVG) Anstalt des Oeffentlichen Rechts, heard 11 November 2010. [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 3:26 am
On Wednesday 21 March 2012 the Supreme Court will hand down judgment in the following: Flood v Times Newspapers Ltd, R (ST) v SoS for the Home Department and Tesco Stores Ltd v Dundee City Council. [read post]
3 Mar 2014, 8:53 pm
Wilson on June 16. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 7:51 am
Google, Wilson v. [read post]
17 Dec 2017, 3:28 pm
Madden v Midland Funding, LLC, 786 F.3d 246 (2d Cir. 2015), cert. denied, 136, S. [read post]
10 Aug 2007, 3:00 am
Commerce Bank U.S. [read post]
27 Jun 2015, 2:50 pm
ROYSTON, RAYZOR, VICKERY, & WILLIAMS, LLP v. [read post]
20 Jul 2012, 3:56 am
The law firm contends it is owed legal fees by Chang in the principal amount of $438,31 I .19 for legal services rendered in pursuit of three related cases involving Chang as follows: Citidress II Cora. v, 207 Second Avenue Realtv Carp, , Index No.121848199 ("Citidress"), Gold Citv Commercial Bank v. 207 Second Avenue Corp, Index No. 104319 /93 ("Gold City") and Janet Chang, as assignee v. [read post]
