Search for: "Wilson v. Frank" Results 1 - 20 of 190
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
Wilson [1] On April 29, the Securities and Exchange Commission announced its proposal to add a new Item 402(v), captioned “Pay versus Performance,” to Regulation S-K. [2] The SEC announced the proposed rule pursuant to Dodd-Frank Section 953(a). [3] Section 953(a) directs the SEC to adopt rules requiring that proxy statements and certain “consent solicitation material” [4] provide “information that shows the relationship between executive… [read post]
1 Aug 2012, 9:06 am by Steve Hall
" is the Balkinization post by Frank Pasquale. [read post]
11 Sep 2017, 12:16 pm by Schachtman
Affinia Group, 2016‐Ohio‐2830, ¶ 37, 54 N.E.3d 174, 182; In reJames Wilson Assoc., 965 F.2d 160, 173 (7th Cir.1992); United States v. [read post]
28 Oct 2013, 9:29 am by Lindsay Griffiths
    New York Court Finds that Dodd-Frank Whistleblower Anti-Retaliation Provision Does Not Apply Extraterritorially from Epstein Becker & Green: John Fullerton III looks at  Meng-Lin Liu v. [read post]
14 Oct 2015, 2:56 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
Lord Wilson concluded that in light of the erroneous approach to the admissibility of the wife’s evidence, the dismissal of her set aside application cannot stand. [read post]
16 Jun 2014, 1:55 pm
Chang, Justice Frank Morrocco came to the opposite conclusion of Wilson. [read post]
11 Apr 2019, 4:20 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Hyland, Tina [*2]Zerilli, and Wilson Elser Moskowitz Edelman & Dicker, LLP (hereinafter collectively the Wilson Elser defendants), who had represented Expedient in the claim denial action, and against Frank Haupel, Michael Schwarz, and DelBello Donnellan Weingarten Wise & Wiederkehr, LLP (hereinafter collectively the DelBello defendants), who had represented First American in the claim denial action. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 5:19 am by Laura Sandwell, Matrix.
Test Claimants in the Franked Investment Income Group Litigation v Commissioners of Inland Revenue and anor, heard 20 – 29 February 2012. [read post]
15 Jul 2010, 8:56 am by Meg Martin
Frank, Frank Law Office, PC, Cheyenne, Wyoming.Representing Runyan: J. [read post]
20 Feb 2012, 5:22 am by Blog Editorial
Four linked cases will also be starting on 21 February in Court Room 2 in front of L Phillips, L Hale, L Mance, L Kerr, and L Wilson. [read post]
19 Nov 2015, 8:00 am by Alice Grainger, Levison Meltzer Pigott
In terms of materiality, he considered the House of Lords’ decision in Livesey (formerly Jenkins) v. [read post]
21 Dec 2007, 6:09 pm
     Several of you have asked for information about the status of the Technology Patents LLC v. [read post]
14 Dec 2009, 3:44 am by Russ Bensing
  The very next day, the Supreme Court, in Wilson v. [read post]