Search for: "Winer v. Winer" Results 1 - 20 of 27
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Dec 2009, 10:01 am
Here is the abstract: The recent Supreme Court decision in Medellín v. [read post]
19 Dec 2008, 4:07 am
  For several years, we have been puzzling over the relationship between online and legacy media, dating back to the first BloggerCons; Dave Winer’s setting up a blog server on the Harvard campus; the first series of podcasts;  our Thursday blog group; the Bloggers Journalism and Credibility conference, at which Jay Rosen proclaimed that “bloggers v. journalism is over”; the rise of Global Voices, the Citizens Media Law Project,… [read post]
15 Dec 2014, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
Pearce & Adam Winer, From Emancipation to Assimilation: Is Secular Liberalism Still Good for Jewish Lawyers? [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 1:11 pm by Daniel A. Burton, Esq.
In a subsequent case to Aronow, the Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division, upheld that decision upon the same premise with a different set of facts, in its holding in Winer v Winer, 242 N.J. [read post]
18 Feb 2015, 5:59 am by Amy Howe
” At Hamilton and Griffin on Rights, Laurence Winer and Nina Crimm explain why they wrote their new book, God, Schools and Government Funding. [read post]
13 Dec 2007, 1:48 pm
Despite the sound logic behind this doctrine, however, the Third Circuit in Winer Family Trust v. [read post]
2 Feb 2015, 12:57 pm by Linda Holmes
” Marriage: Cott, Nancy, Public Vows: A History of Marriage and the Nation (2000) Lind, Goran, Common Law Marriage: A Legal Institution for Cohabitation (2008) Maillard, Kevin, Loving v. [read post]
13 May 2016, 11:46 am by ihwiner
 See ArcSoft, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Jun 2020, 12:26 pm by Marty Lederman
“Bill” Priestap, Sarah Raskin, Steve Ricchetti, Susan Rice, Rod Rosenstein, Gabriel Sanz-Rexach, Nathan Sheets, Elizabeth Sherwood-Randall, Glenn Simpson, Steve Somma, Peter Strzok, Michael Sussman, Adam Szubin, Jonathan Winer, Christopher Wray, and Sally Yates.According to both President Trump (in his personal capacity) and the Solicitor General of the United States, this Judiciary Committee investigation is unconstitutional, and therefore recipients of the subpoenas need not… [read post]