Search for: "Winkelman v. State"
Results 1 - 20
of 45
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Feb 2007, 7:24 pm
On February 27, 2007, the Court will hear Winkelman v. [read post]
1 Mar 2007, 10:20 am
On Tuesday, the Court heard argument in Winkelman v. [read post]
21 May 2007, 10:26 am
Pollock report here (subscription req'd) on today's opinions in Bell Atlantic and Winkelman and the Court's decision to review Kentucky Department of Revenue v. [read post]
22 May 2007, 11:15 am
Winkelman v. [read post]
22 May 2007, 4:41 am
In Winkelman v. [read post]
26 Feb 2007, 5:39 am
The question presented:In Troxel v. [read post]
14 Jan 2013, 3:52 pm
There is one US Supreme Court decision concerning legal representation: In Winkelman by Winkelman v. [read post]
11 Jul 2015, 9:02 am
To be clear a parent may still have an advocate present to advise her, but the advocate may not be able to represent the parent depending upon state law.There is one US Supreme Court decision concerning legal representation: In Winkelman by Winkelman v. [read post]
16 Sep 2017, 9:00 am
To be clear a parent may still have an advocate present to advise her, but the advocate may not be able to represent the parent depending upon state law.There is one US Supreme Court decision concerning legal representation: In Winkelman by Winkelman v. [read post]
24 May 2007, 9:35 am
New Jersey State Bd. [read post]
8 Aug 2017, 11:56 am
Chris Winkelman is general counsel to the National Republican Congressional Committee, which filed an amicus brief in support of the state appellants in Gill v. [read post]
22 May 2007, 3:42 pm
Frye that offers new insight on U.S. v. [read post]
15 Jul 2010, 7:00 am
B.J.S. v. [read post]
21 May 2007, 8:13 am
Hanson, No. 06-618 (opinion here; oral argument transcript here); Winkelman v. [read post]
20 Sep 2007, 1:48 pm
Winkelman v. [read post]
2 Sep 2010, 2:01 pm
Most recently, Jackie was a practicum intern at our library, where she created a digital image collection and analysis of Winkelman v. [read post]
26 Aug 2011, 1:12 pm
There is one US Supreme Court decision concerning legal representation: In Winkelman by Winkelman v. [read post]
21 May 2007, 9:29 am
Seven Justices joined fully in the ruling, and two partially dissented, in Winkelman v. [read post]
21 May 2007, 8:07 am
Seven Justices joined fully in the ruling, and two partially dissented, in Winkelman v. [read post]
