Search for: "Winston v. Lee"
Results 1 - 20
of 42
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Jul 2014, 12:27 pm
The TTAB cited the recent Stone Lion Capital Partners, LP v. [read post]
22 Jul 2014, 2:49 pm
Lee v. [read post]
5 Mar 2010, 5:25 am
Winston v. [read post]
19 May 2007, 1:46 pm
Lee, 2007 La. [read post]
7 Nov 2013, 12:31 am
The key case is Winston v. [read post]
16 Sep 2009, 7:00 pm
PD-1441-08, David Lee Anderson, II v. [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 10:48 am
See Winston v. [read post]
16 Apr 2021, 9:50 am
But the prior owners of the VLSI v. [read post]
28 Nov 2010, 10:02 pm
The search was valid under Winston v. [read post]
23 Nov 2020, 4:00 am
Vasileía tou Theoú, (South Dakota Law Review, Vol. 65, No. 2, 2020).Brian Owsley, Is The Supreme Court Irrational: Trump v. [read post]
16 Apr 2009, 3:20 am
Winston v. [read post]
8 Apr 2022, 8:54 am
George School of Law Challenging Students’ Assumptions to Aid Them in Serving Underserved Clients Carla Spivack, Oklahoma City University School of Law, Teaching Breach of Fiduciary Duties in the Context of Cobell v. [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 3:05 am
Hempstead v Winston & Strawn, LLP, 28 AD3d 746, 749; Mecca v Shang, 258 AD2d 569), and likewise subject to the three-year limitations period (see Harris v Kahn, Hoffman, Nonenmacher & Hochman, LLP, 59 AD3d 390; Melendez v Bernstein, 29 AD3d 872). [read post]
15 Apr 2011, 7:55 am
The court used the factors found in Winston v. [read post]
1 Jun 2007, 6:44 am
Let's say that hypothetically you disagree with the Supreme Court's recent holding in Ledbetter v. [read post]
1 Jun 2007, 5:35 am
Let's say that hypothetically you disagree with the Supreme Court's recent holding in Ledbetter v. [read post]
6 Oct 2016, 7:40 am
Lee, 470 U.S. 753, 760 (1985); Schmerber v. [read post]
18 Nov 2011, 10:18 pm
Where a bodily intrusion is concerned, the court must give careful consideration to “not only the probable worth of the evidence to the investigation, but the nature of alternative means, if any, for obtaining the evidence” (Matter of Abe A., 56 NY2d 288, 298; see Winston v Lee, 470 US 753). [read post]
10 Jun 2010, 6:54 am
Lee), or seizing adult pornography in the home which is a constitutionally protected right (Stanley v. [read post]
11 May 2012, 4:35 pm
– Winston-Salem attorney Robin Shea of Constangy on the firm’s blog, Employment & Labor Insider Obama Adds Three Requirements to Retroactive Review of Regulations – Washington, DC lawyer Lee Beck on his blog, the Federal Regulations Advisor [read post]
