Search for: "Wisconsin v. Illinois" Results 41 - 60 of 682
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Jan 2010, 6:12 am by Adam Chandler
Last month Michigan asked the Supreme Court to order Illinois to block the entry of Asian carp, a ravenous fish species, into Lake Michigan-a request that has since been joined by Minnesota, New York, Ohio, Ontario, and Wisconsin. [read post]
7 Sep 2016, 10:07 am by Kevin Cloutier and Mikela Sutrina
This legislative action, of course, follows the significant Illinois court decision in Fifield v. [read post]
31 May 2014, 4:57 am by Robert Kreisman
Related blog posts: Illinois Non-Competition Agreement is Not Valid and Enforceable if Employee is Fired or Resigns Within Two Years Illinois Appellate Court Reverses Trial Court’s Finding Regarding Borrowed Employee Status; Hastings v. [read post]
30 Mar 2015, 9:42 am by Bill Raftery
V, Sec. 6 Illinois: Supreme Court Judges shall select a Chief Justice from their number to serve for a term of three years. [read post]
26 Aug 2010, 12:58 pm
Hardin, 2010 WL 2524155, the Illinois Supreme Court held that probable cause standard was met under the Sexually Violent Persons Commitment Act (725 ILCS 207/1 et seq.) adopting a more relaxed standard employed by the state of Wisconsin in State v. [read post]
8 Jul 2007, 5:21 pm
The article mentions Christian Legal Society v Southern Illinois University at Carbondale as one example of this kind of litigation (see prior postings here and here). [read post]
25 Apr 2012, 11:51 am by Kirk Jenkins
Whitehead, No. 113365 – Is the provision of an Illinois automobile insurance policy imposing a two-year statute of limitations on uninsured motorists claims invalid as against public policy with respect to an accident which occurred in Wisconsin, where the statute of limitations for uninsured motorist claims is three years?   [read post]
10 Sep 2017, 10:43 am by Howard Friedman
LEXIS 144100 (SD IL, Sept. 6, 2017), an Illinois federal district court allowed an inmate to move ahead with his complaint that authorities refused to provide him with a diet consistent with his Native American religious beliefs.In Thomas v. [read post]