Search for: "Wisconsin v. Michigan"
Results 61 - 80
of 678
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Nov 2006, 6:13 am
I (or perhaps Steve V.) may have some update later if one of us is able to go. [read post]
14 Nov 2016, 7:13 am
’s apparently likely plans to repeal the D.C. stun gun ban, and the other recent repeals (or conclusions of unconstitutionality) in Wisconsin, Michigan, the Virgin Islands, Overland Park (Kansas), and Anne Arundel County, Baltimore County and Harford County (all in Maryland). [read post]
18 May 2016, 2:42 pm
Said that Roe v. [read post]
12 Dec 2020, 5:04 am
Pennsylvania, which had sought to invalidate election results in four swing states that President Donald Trump lost in the November 2020 presidential election, namely Pennsylvania, Georgia, Wisconsin and Michigan. [read post]
28 Feb 2012, 1:30 pm
Supreme Court, in the case of Michigan, et al., Petitioners v. [read post]
28 Feb 2012, 1:27 pm
Supreme Court, in the case of Michigan, et al., Petitioners v. [read post]
13 Nov 2012, 9:24 am
Turner v. [read post]
29 Nov 2020, 5:31 pm
Michigan: In Costantino v. [read post]
23 Jun 2018, 6:24 am
People v Pomeroy and People v Fulcher, 419 Mich 44, held that a person sleeping in a motionless car was not “operating” the vehicle under Michigan’s drunk driving statute. [read post]
9 Sep 2018, 2:10 pm
LEXIS 150895 (ED WI, Sept. 5, 2018), a Wisconsin federal district court allowed a Muslim inmate to move ahead with his complaint that on most days he was served vegan meals instead of Halal meals.In Trainauskas v. [read post]
9 Dec 2020, 3:38 pm
” Georgia, Michigan, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin are scheduled to file their response to Texas’ suit by Thursday at 3 p.m. [read post]
6 Jun 2012, 9:08 pm
[John Samples, Cato Institute] “Comparing the Impact: Public Sector Labor Reform in Wisconsin and Indiana” [Josh Barro via Reihan Salam] Where next — on to Michigan? [read post]
14 Dec 2011, 7:53 pm
Interestingly, in justifying why the Supreme Court should review the denial of the injunction, the States assert that this is a common law case of nuisance between several states (Michigan, Minnesota, Ohio, Wisconsin and Pennsylvania) on one hand, and the United States Army Corps of Engineers and "an instrumentality of Illinois" on the other hand. [read post]
2 Oct 2011, 7:05 pm
In 1990, the United States Supreme Court ruled in Michigan v. [read post]
2 Oct 2011, 7:05 pm
In 1990, the United States Supreme Court ruled in Michigan v. [read post]
9 Dec 2020, 6:15 am
Join for spirited but respectful debate between Professors Chesney and Vladeck as they discuss: The legal basis for a possible presidential action to compel Pfizer to bump the United States ahead of other countries when it comes to accessing vaccine doses beyond the 100 million covered in the current contract Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton’s attempt to get the Supreme Court to adjudicate a claim by Texas that the election results in Georgia, Wisconsin, Michigan and… [read post]
11 Dec 2020, 4:50 pm
” In four separate briefs that sometimes used sharp language not normally found in Supreme Court filings, Georgia, Michigan, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin urged the justices to stay out of the dispute. [read post]
28 Apr 2017, 6:14 am
Region V covers Ohio, Illinois, Michigan, Wisconsin, Indiana and Minnesota. [read post]
13 Dec 2020, 6:34 pm
Wisconsin: In Feehan v. [read post]
17 Apr 2015, 8:58 am
EPA and West Virginia v. [read post]
