Search for: "Wisely v. Superior Court (People) (1985)" Results 1 - 11 of 11
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Jun 2023, 4:00 am by Guest Blogger
From a review of the Superior Court’s most recent annual report, from the 2017/2018 year, it is clear that the Superior Court had limited insight into its own operations. [read post]
4 Jun 2008, 7:31 am
Pam KarlanRick Hills's recent post over at Prawfsblawg on the Supreme Court's decision in Riley v. [read post]
25 May 2011, 12:35 pm by The Legal Blog
In practice, this means that inferior courts are bound to apply the legal principles set down by superior courts in earlier cases. [read post]
26 Apr 2017, 4:00 am by Guest Blogger
Some people have an axe to grind and will persist in their defamatory conduct even in the face of legal proceedings. [read post]
16 Aug 2007, 7:20 am
Superior Court, 231 P.2d 26, 28 (Cal. 1951) ("if there had been a physician patient relationship, the privilege would be waived. . . by [plaintiff's] bringing the action for personal injuries").The Weiss court determined that, since neither the state legislature nor the state courts had seen fit to create a physician/patient privilege, it was not the job of a federal court, sitting in diversity, to change state law. 2007 WL 2137782, at *2… [read post]