Search for: "Wisniewski v. State" Results 1 - 20 of 28
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Oct 2021, 5:52 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
The cause of action alleging defamation failed because the challenged statements were absolutely privileged as a matter of law and cannot be the basis for a defamation action (see Ifantides v Wisniewski, 181 AD3d at 576; Weinstock v Sanders, 144 AD3d at 1021; Brady v Gaudelli, 137 AD3d at 952; El Jamal v Weil, 116 AD3d 732, 734 [2014]; Rabiea v Stein, 69 AD3d at 701). [read post]
27 Jun 2021, 4:15 pm by INFORRM
The legal requirements, designed to protect media plurality when Murdoch bought the Times titles as he already owned The Sun and the News of the World, state the newspapers must be kept separate and editorially independent under the supervision of six independent directors. [read post]
30 May 2021, 4:07 pm by INFORRM
United States The Guardian had a piece “Chicago mayor sued by journalist for limiting interviews to reporters of color”. [read post]
7 Jun 2020, 4:34 pm by INFORRM
Hunton Andrews Kurt Privacy & Information Security Law Blog had a post “EDPB Releases Statement on Restrictions on Data Subject Rights in Connection with the State of Emergency in Member States”. [read post]
17 Dec 2019, 4:03 am by Edith Roberts
At Legal Insurrection, Cody Wisniewski reluctantly predicts based on the oral argument in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association Inc. v. [read post]
3 Jun 2019, 4:01 am by Edith Roberts
” At The Federalist, Cory Wisniewski urges the court to decide New York State Rifle & Pistol Association Inc. v. [read post]
30 May 2018, 4:26 am by Paul Willetts
The Court rejected these assertions, stating that:The meaning of the word “solicit” is obvious. [read post]
4 Feb 2015, 3:56 pm by Carlo Van den Bosch
Sheppard Mullin’s intellectual property group prevailed before the United States Supreme Court in the trademark matter entitled Hana Financial v. [read post]
8 May 2014, 9:05 pm by Walter Olson
Quinn amicus] “Alcoholism and the ADA: Not as clear-cut as you think” [Dan Wisniewski, HR Morning, on Crosby v. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 6:43 am
  Finding the patent bad in both respects, the Judge stated: The upshot is that the Patent does no more than invite the skilled team to perform what Prof Wisniewski rightly described as a “very significant research project with a high prospect of failure” and, if they succeed, claims the fruits of their research. [read post]