Search for: "Withers v. Withers" Results 1 - 20 of 269
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Nov 2008, 11:46 am
The case of White v Withers LLP & Anor [2008] EWHC 2821 (QB) deals with that all too common scenario where one spouse takes documents belonging to the other spouse, for possible use in ancillary relief proceedings. [read post]
28 Oct 2009, 12:45 am
Such documents are, of course, known as "Hildebrand documents", so named after the 1992 case Hildebrand v Hildebrand. [read post]
13 Jan 2010, 3:24 am
Well, for whatever reason, it seems that the White v Withers case is back in the news. [read post]
26 May 2015, 8:58 am by Howard Wasserman
Another SCOTUS opinion day (and possibly another opinion week) has passed and still no Elonis v. [read post]
22 Nov 2008, 2:44 pm
Posts mentioned in the video:No SatisfactionWhite v Withers LLP: No cause of actionTory Reform PlansBarmyWonderfully absurd quotes? [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 5:39 pm by laborprof lpb
Stone (UCLA) has a nice blog post at the Huffington Post on American Express v. [read post]
5 Feb 2017, 10:16 pm by Howard Wasserman
Where is the line between criticizing the judiciary and engaging in threats that potentially undermine the independence of the judiciary? [read post]
3 Jun 2011, 8:23 am by LawDiva
This week Withers and Marcus Dearle settled the case with Mr. [read post]
15 Apr 2010, 5:47 am
38/09 P, Ralf Schräder v Community Plant Variety Office (CPVO) is an altogether less publicly visible event -- an appeal to the European Union's highest Court against the General Court's dismissal of an appeal from the CPVO. [read post]
5 Sep 2007, 7:39 am
This guest post was written by David Booth Alden. [read post]
11 Jun 2015, 2:44 am by Lyle Denniston
The most recent case in point: the Justices on Monday declined to review a San Francisco gun law that was remarkably similar to one they struck down in a landmark ruling in 2008 [District of Columbia v. [read post]
10 Apr 2013, 10:02 am
O'Connor is withering, and I think you can hear Dellinger — arguing that civil suits against the President must be delayed until after he's out of office — losing in 3 minutes of real time. [read post]