Search for: "Withrow v. Larkin"
Results 1 - 6
of 6
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe:
8 Mar 2016, 7:57 am
The Court disagrees, citing Withrow v. [read post]
8 Jun 2009, 10:50 am
Larkin, 421 U.S. 35. [read post]
8 Jun 2009, 10:50 am
Larkin, 421 U.S. 35. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 9:19 am
The standard they adopt appears to be grounded in psychology: citing Withrow v Larkin, they state that a conflict of interest requires recusal if "under a realistic appraisal of psychological tendencies and human weakness, the interest poses such a risk of acutal bias or prejudgment that the practice must be forbidden if the guaranteeof due process is to be adequately implemented." [read post]
17 Nov 2011, 9:06 am
The first sentence is quote from Withrow v Larkin, and thus it could be seen as Roberts relying on precedent. [read post]
