Search for: "Wood v. Beach" Results 1 - 20 of 120
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Jun 2010, 9:30 am by Robert Thomas (inversecondemnation.com)
Things I never thought I would see in a Supreme Court opinion include the riddle "how much wood would a woodchuck chuck if a woodchuck could chuck wood," but there it is, in black and white on page 11 of Justice Scalia's opinion today in Stop the Beach Renourishment, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Aug 2010, 3:23 pm by Mark Murakami
Robert Thomas, Tred Eyerly and I filed an amicus curiae brief in the case of Stop the Beach Renourishment v. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 9:08 pm by Adam Winkler
Last week, the Supreme Court decided Stop the Beach Renourishment v. [read post]
8 May 2019, 11:23 am by Injury at Sea
They are creating a response plan to safeguard the beach and a nearby shorebird nesting area. [read post]
13 May 2008, 12:19 pm
But Justice Woods is correct that you are indeed allowed to have admiralty claims in state court in limited circumstances under the savings to suitors clause. [read post]
7 May 2019, 4:05 pm by Joseph Stacey
They are creating a response plan to safeguard the beach and a nearby shorebird nesting area. [read post]
26 Jul 2017, 7:07 am
Its campsites are located in a heavily wooded campground area, portions of which were cleared of trees. [read post]
12 Feb 2018, 5:17 am by Eugene Volokh
Tort law often gives you some rather odd fact patterns; here's one I just came across, from Woods-Leber v. [read post]
14 Aug 2010, 12:46 am by Robert Thomas (inversecondemnation.com)
Having now acknowledged Justice Scalia’s reference to one of the most unlikely phrases ever turned in a Supreme Court opinion, we can move on to the more intriguing questions presented by Stop the Beach Renourishment v. [read post]